--- description: GitHub : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur GitHub, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Développement d'applications](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github Page : 1/249\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github?page=2) > GitHub permet aux équipes de développement de collaborer, d'examiner et de gérer le code au sein d'un pipeline DevOps et d'une sécurité de code intégrée. > > Conclusion : 6189 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise GitHub ? Développement de logiciels tout à la fois pour les start-up de petite taille et pour les grandes entreprises. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 6189 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Microsoft - **Pays**: Redmond, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1975 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 4,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Biélorussie, Brésil, Bulgarie, Canada, Chine, Corée du Sud, Croatie, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Hongrie, Inde et 27 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse de la vulnérabilité - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Débogage - Déploiement continu - Développement collaboratif - Environnement de développement intégré - Examen du code - Gestion de la configuration - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des backlogs - Gestion des billets - Gestion des problèmes - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tâches - Gestion des versions - Interface graphique - Intégration continue - Livraison continue - Monitoring - Outils de collaboration - Partage des fichiers - Real-Time Analytics - Reporting et suivi de projet - Saisie de bug et de problème - Suivi de la progression des tâches - Suivi des bugs - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des étapes - Sécurité des applications - Tableau de bord ## Intégrations (14 au total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Développement d'applications](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Développement d'applications](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de projet à but non lucratif](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Gestion de projets](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Intégration continue](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.lu/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1223 reviews) 2. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.lu/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15421 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.lu/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3023 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.lu/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4606 reviews) ## Avis ### "Un outil essentiel pour la gestion de projets de développement" — 4.0/5 > **Julia** | *29 avril 2026* | Immobilier | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: J’apprécie particulièrement la gestion des versions avec Git, la collaboration efficace entre équipes, ainsi que les fonctionnalités comme les pull requests et l’intégration continue. > > **Inconvénients**: L’interface peut être complexe pour les débutants, et certaines fonctionnalités avancées nécessitent du temps pour être maîtrisées. > > Mon expérience avec GitHub est très positive. Il me permet de gérer efficacement mes projets, de collaborer facilement avec d’autres développeurs et de suivre les modifications du code de manière structurée. ----- ### "Reliable Platform for Version Control and Test Automation Collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *20 mai 2026* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub made collaboration and version control very efficient for development and automation testing projects. I especially liked the seamless integration with VS Code, which made committing, reviewing, and managing code much easier directly from the editor. Using GitHub together with Playwright helped streamline test automation workflows, maintain test scripts, and collaborate effectively with team members through PRs and branch management. > > **Inconvénients**: Managing merge conflicts and repository permissions sometimes required extra attention. Some advanced enterprise features and CI/CD capabilities may also become expensive for smaller teams. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been very positive. It has been a reliable platform for source code management, collaboration, and automation testing workflows. The integration with VS Code improved developer productivity, and using Playwright with GitHub helped organize and maintain automated test scripts efficiently. Features like pull requests, issue tracking, and GitHub Actions added value to the development lifecycle and team collaboration. ----- ### "The Version Control Packed With Features" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *27 mai 2026* | Biens de consommation | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: This version control makes coding, deployment and maintainance of repository easier for a team.The tool is also exceptional for automating workflows. Easy to integrate with other UI platforms such as source tree , making it user friendly. > > **Inconvénients**: Permission and security management with access tokens can be complicated. For large enterprices, Github can be expensive. For a new user, advance features have a steap learning curve. > > overall, I have a positive experience with the platform. Github is a widely used version control platform helping team collaboration and clean coding. over the years, it has created a strong ecosystem of its own. The large online community makes the life of a user easier. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 juin 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Inconvénients**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 avril 2026* | Sécurité et enquêtes | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Inconvénients**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- Page : 1/249\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Données structurées