--- description: Fusion Framework System : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Fusion Framework System, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Fusion Framework System - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des risques](/directory/30665/risk-management/software) > [Fusion Framework System](/software/150583/fusion) # Fusion Framework System Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/150583/fusion Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/150583/fusion?page=2) > Découvrez comment Fusion peut redéfinir vos programmes de business continuity et de gestion des risques. > > Conclusion : 51 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Fusion Framework System ? Les organisations qui veulent atteindre la résilience opérationnelle. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 51 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Fusion Risk Management - **Pays**: Rolling Meadows, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 2006 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Chromebook (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, arabe, chinois, chinois traditionnel, coréen, danois, espagnol, français, irlandais, italien, japonais, norvégien, néerlandais, portugais, russe, suédois, thaï - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Autriche, Belgique, Brésil, Canada, Chine, Danemark, France, Irlande, Japon, Luxembourg, Mexique, Norvège, Pays-Bas, Royaume-Uni, Suisse, Suède, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Accès mobile - Alertes de risque - Alertes/Notifications - Contrôle du processus d'approbation - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion de projets - Gestion des audits - Gestion des communications - Gestion des contrats/licences - Gestion des contrôles internes - Gestion des documents - Gestion des enquêtes - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des fournisseurs - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des risques - Gestion des risques liés à l'informatique - Gestion des risques opérationnels - Gestion des réponses - Gestion des tâches - Gestion des évaluations - Intégration des employés - Mesure des performances - Notation des risques - Offboarding - Piste d'audit - Portail libre-service - Rapports d'incidents - Real-Time Reporting - Reprise d'activité - Risk Analysis - Stockage sécurisé des données - Suivi des statuts - Tableau de bord - Visualisation de données - Workflow configurable - Évaluation des risques ## Intégrations (11 au total) - AlertMedia - Argos Risk - Boomi - Everbridge Mass Notification - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - OnSolve Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - SecurityScorecard - ServiceNow - Supply Wisdom - xMatters ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30665/risk-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Gestion des risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [Logiciels d'ERM (Enterprise Risk Management)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32559/erm/software) - [Logiciels de Plan de Continuité d'Activité (PCA)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30206/business-continuity/software) - [Gestion des fournisseurs](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10024/vendor-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion intégrée de risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [GOAT Risk](https://www.capterra.lu/software/205001/goat-risk) — 4.7/5 (65 reviews) 2. [Pirani](https://www.capterra.lu/software/196959/pirani) — 4.5/5 (203 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.lu/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 4. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.lu/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) 5. [D\&B Finance Analytics](https://www.capterra.lu/software/202723/d-b-finance-analytics) — 4.5/5 (137 reviews) ## Avis ### "Strong Business Continuity and Resilience Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Greg** | *22 mai 2024* | Produits alimentaires | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The Fusion platform has helped us build our continuity plans, categorize our risks, and incidents across our organization. Fusion is very easy to use, update, and everything connects together easily. The platform is very reliable and stable. In addition, Fusion has been thoughtful with integrations, such as with AlertMedia and Security Scorecard, which allows you to bring in additional data for context and awareness. > > **Inconvénients**: Because the platform is built on Salesforce, which is pretty easy to use, you're limited to what Salesforce can (or cannot) do - such as enhancements or specific customizations. Also, with Salesforce, additional seat licenses can be expensive. > > We have been partners with Fusion since 2017 and have used the product quite extensively. They are a passionate organization that wants to see their clients be successful and resilient. They have been great to work with. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System, by Ed Brown" — 5.0/5 > **Ed** | *31 janvier 2020* | Assurance | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I love the simplicity as an administrator to make changes, within my knowledge limits and the use of Fuel Hours to supplement my knowledge gaps. There were very view, but some, implementation problems. Fusion listens to their clients and has since improved their implementation process. I presented a complex model to determine the process RTO based 9 impact categories over time. They delivered what I wanted. Of course, I think, everyone client would want this model and it should be a separate object because it did eat up a lot of our available custom fields in the process object. We are working with Fusion to pull that part out and create a new object or leverage a lesser used object. I really like the incident management object. > > **Inconvénients**: I think there should have been standard dashboarding out of the box. All clients implement a program with a BCP life cycle and dashboard are used to help user and program managers manage compliance to the annual deliverables. Instead these were created with fuel hours. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 2.) I am also accustom to having a BIA (Process) review with a maintenance control and we used fuel hours to enhance this for a BIA approval section. I think that should be standard. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 4.) Lastly plan conga generator and its templates are not well designed and we have had several changes requested to make them design the way we want them. Fusion could spend more time on the conga templates clients may like. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 7.) All these cons are correctable and have been and which is why I added the first PRO above. > > Improved crisis management and communication during events. We call these response plans which are activated based on the level of the event and are a prelude to a recovery plan activation. ----- ### "Expensive product with lots of hidden caveats." — 3.0/5 > **Kevin** | *16 octobre 2022* | Banque | Taux de recommandation : 2.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is not vaporware and does cover a wide area on a number of BC, DR, QA, EM, Risk, etc areas. > > **Inconvénients**: Limited by Salesforce platform and decisions. Can't run large reports. Have to export to run deep analytics. No real tools to measure performance of system or determine what the issues are. No Archiving built in. Audits require evidence within a audit window period "typically" in the past. Reporting ability with Conga is outdated. Even the new Adv Reporting should be called Adv Dashboarding. Executives DO NOT want to login to see those pretty pictures. Need a supported interface to PowerBI. SOQL is NOT SQL. Joins limited to 3 levels. Every SQL tool I have used to solve problems in the past is basically NOT allowed in SOQL. Lacking Audit tools to even use Shield product. Lack of advanced training specific for the tool. Need a 3rd party blog site to track and discuss issues that will NEVER be discussed or even allowed in the ENGAGE meetings. Limitations on refreshes, limitation on space for data, and the absolute need to engage with additional 3rd parties and tools for Deployments and backup and recovery. It is embarrassing that a Risk (BC/DR) tool does not even have "self coverage" of BC/DR within an RTO/RPO or MTO that would pass an audit much less a real event. > > If you go with base package, then load your data and go from there, you will have a better chance of success. Like all software packages, the Devil is in the details. If you want a bespoke solution then do not buy a package that limits your ability to customize it to the UI or the limitations of ANOTHER 3rd party (Salesforce) which is an independent company that creates issues on "who" to even talk to. ----- ### "Fabulous Fusion Framework" — 5.0/5 > **Vicky** | *3 février 2020* | Télécommunications | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: That it is so flexible and configurable. We have very specific requirements based on our risk models and this platform allows us to meet every single one. > > **Inconvénients**: The classic version is dated, but moving to the Lightening is improving our end user experience. It is also somewhat difficult to learn some of the concepts of relational data, how they integrate and are maximized for those who don't have a background in software back ends. Having said that, I'm not a developer and can do most of my own configurations. > > It took us time to set up and integrate all of our data, but just plan development for all but one of the 40 teams, went from estimated 3-5 days, down to 1 day. That is BIA data collection in the AM and BCP in the PM. We had basic plans with requirements done in 1 day\! This saved us 10K hours of team time during the first year. We have been thrilled with the automation both on the planning side and on the Risk Management side. ----- ### "Fusion Framework System" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *6 février 2020* | Santé, bien-être et fitness | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Plan configuration and management, Incident management, Processes, Library Procedure Group options, Dashboard for reports, Application and Component records. We were looking to replace our old LDRPS and this was clearly a better tool. > > **Inconvénients**: The inability to remove/delete user accounts. > > The tool works well for our BC and IT plan management. We have taken the next step to use the tool for our disaster recovery exercise monitoring. We are monitoring our exercises and proof of concepts manually and we will eventually implement the Service now connection that will allow us to track, monitor and delegate tasks once an incident is triggered and the plans are executed. We are looking to use the tool too its full capability. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/150583/fusion?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/150583/fusion) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées