--- description: Juro : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Juro, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Juro - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion de contrats](/directory/30078/contract-management/software) > [Juro](/software/167130/juro) # Juro Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/167130/juro Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/167130/juro?page=2) > Gestion des contrats basée sur l'IA, conçue pour les entreprises modernes. > > Conclusion : 41 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Juro ? Équipes commerciales, RH, opérationnelles et juridiques. De nombreux clients sont en phase de croissance et des grandes entreprises. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 41 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Juro - **Pays**: London, R.-U. - **Fondé**: 2016 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, danois, espagnol, finnois, français, hongrois, irlandais, italien, norvégien, néerlandais, polonais, portugais, russe, suédois, tchèque, ukrainien - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Allemagne, Andorre, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Bahamas, Barbade, Belgique, Belize, Bermudes, Biélorussie, Bosnie-Herzégovine, Bulgarie, Canada, Chypre, Costa Rica et 95 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Collaboration en équipe - Contrôle du processus d'approbation - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Gestion de versions - Gestion des flux de travail - Modèles personnalisables - Modèles prédéfinis - Outils de collaboration - Partage des fichiers - Recherche en texte intégral - Recherche/Filtre - Saisie de documents - Signature électronique - Stockage de documents - Suivi de la conformité - Third-Party Integrations ## Intégrations (11 au total) - Google Drive - Greenhouse - HubSpot CRM - Okta - Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Slack - Workday Financial Management - Workday HCM - Workday Talent Management - Zapier ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion de contrats](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30078/contract-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion de contrats](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30078/contract-management/software) - [Gestion des documents](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Docusign](https://www.capterra.lu/software/121506/docusign) — 4.7/5 (9268 reviews) 2. [Deel](https://www.capterra.lu/software/205015/deel) — 4.8/5 (4265 reviews) 3. [Adobe Acrobat](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1012240/adobe-acrobat-dc) — 4.7/5 (4170 reviews) 4. [Webdox](https://www.capterra.lu/software/197944/webdox) — 4.7/5 (147 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.lu/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) ## Avis ### "Great cutting-edge contract management software" — 5.0/5 > **Sharief** | *24 octobre 2018* | Immobilier | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Juro makes creating and managing customer contracts at scale an absolute breeze. We can get a customised contract out to a customer in seconds rather than 30+ minutes now, are able to chat with customers and answer their questions within the contract itself, and get instantly informed via Slack when it's been signed. > > **Inconvénients**: There are two primary areas of improvement: - The first is the ability to track changes - we create new versions of contracts on a constant basis, so being able to redline, see what changes have been made, and store those versions in a logical way would be hugely helpful - The second related point is the version control - the filing system for contract templates is rudimentary (i.e. there is one folder for all templates) and would be improved if it was possible to add subfolders However, the benefits for us far outweigh the above as we have workarounds > > Juro makes the life for our legal and sales teams significantly easier. We've cut down the time taken to create a contract by 96% and also made tracking of signatures much more visible. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *8 août 2025* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Juro makes contract creation and management feel intuitive and collaborative. In particular the contract based editor is great - it’s much easier to use than clunky Word-based workflows. I liked how easy it was to standardise contracts, collect approvals, and keep everything in one place without having to constantly jump between tools. It really helped reduce legal bottlenecks and gave our ops team better visibility and control. > > **Inconvénients**: Personally, the pricing was a challenge for us, especially as a growing company with evolving priorities. While the features are solid, it became difficult to justify the cost when we were reassessing our tech stack. Some of the reporting felt a bit limited too - we would’ve liked more flexible analytics around contract statuses etc. > > Overall, Juro was a great solution for simplifying and speeding up our contract workflows. It’s well-designed, user-friendly, and clearly built with operations and legal teams in mind. We still use it for some planning templates, which speaks to how useful the platform is – but ultimately, we had to step away from it due to budget constraints. If pricing aligns with your stage and needs, it’s a very strong option. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Zach** | *3 avril 2026* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Juro streamlines contract creation and approvals, giving users clear visibility over contract status, terms, and sign‑off. Standardised templates and structured workflows reduce errors, speed up execution, and improve control over commercial agreements without heavy legal involvement. > > **Inconvénients**: Nothing comes to mind so far; the platform has met our needs without causing issues or friction. etc ----- ### "Something good but major flaw" — 3.0/5 > **Terho** | *12 avril 2024* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 2.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Pretty easy to use and contract negotiation part functions well. > > **Inconvénients**: It has major flaws concerning signing procedure. Attachments are not legally part of the contract since they are not merged as attachments to actual signed contract. And you can change attachments after signing. This has caused major issues with the customers. ----- ### "Allows me to avoid converting contract drafts into a jumbled email chain" — 5.0/5 > **Brion** | *26 janvier 2026* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Mainly, I use Juro for drafting and reviewing contract versions, sending those versions as well as having them signed in a single application rather than constantly jumping back and forth between MS Word documents and emails. On an everyday basis I am working on Juro making small tweaks to contract language, requesting comments from team members via tags and sending the final versions of contracts for signature in a single application. What I like about Juro is I can clearly see which part of the process has stalled rather than having to guess who still needs to look at it. > > **Inconvénients**: Editing more complex contracts can sometimes be somewhat restrictive, particularly if I need to do some extremely detailed formatting of that contract. Also, I had to spend more time than I anticipated cleaning up, editing and moving all of our current templates into the new system. Although some of the functionality in Juro was incredibly powerful, it was not always immediately apparent until I had spent enough time using the product. > > Juro significantly reduces the amount of "back and forth" and version confusion that occurred previously with contracts being created and managed through emails and shared drive systems. That results in reduced delays, as well as significantly less mental overhead (or stress) when managing many different contracts simultaneously. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/167130/juro?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/167130/juro) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Données structurées