--- description: Cypress : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Cypress, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cypress - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Cypress](/software/168276/cypress) # Cypress Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/168276/cypress Page : 1/4\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/168276/cypress?page=2) > Outil permettant de réaliser des tests "front end" sur tout programme exécuté sur un navigateur. > > Conclusion : 67 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Cypress ? Convient aux développeurs et ingénieurs de contrôle qualité "front end" qui conçoivent des tests automatisés et cherchent à simplifier le processus d'exécution des tests. Spécialement conçu pour ces professionnels, Cypress accélère et simplifie l'exécution des tests, tout en les rendant plus fiables. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 67 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Cypress.io - **Pays**: Atlanta, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 2015 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 99,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Vue hiérarchique ## Ressources d'aide - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.lu/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 4. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 5. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) ## Avis ### "Cypress is easy and single packed" — 4.0/5 > **Prakash** | *16 décembre 2020* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: This automation tool is very easy to install and write tests. The thing I liked most in cypress are given below: i. No need to install extra driver for browser. ii. It uses JS and very suitable for single page applications. iii. Single line of code will install the cypress in your machine. iv. I really love its features like time travel, video recording and image capturing, auto waiting and so on. > > **Inconvénients**: I have found some issues in cypress. They are working on to fix these issues. i. It does not support multiple browsers which is not be suitable for some tests. ii. "Detached from DOM" this is the common issue I have encountered. > > I am working as an automation engineer where I feel cypress is easy to install and get rolling. I like its outstanding features including time-travel, video, screenshots and so on. It has some issues as well but I prefer using Cypress to other automation tools. ----- ### "Quick and easy testing for everyone." — 5.0/5 > **Piotr** | *2 juin 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Simplicity. Customer support. Documentation. Functionalities - Shadow DOM, DOM manipulation, debugger, videos and screenshots, automatic wait, etc. Open mode with all execution details. A number of additional plugins and ease of implementation. Frontend, Backend, and API testing support. > > **Inconvénients**: Poor support of parallelization, iframes. It may be not intuitive. Minor bugs specific to this framework. > > I am working with Cypress for over 3 years. This framework is reliable, fast, and user-friendly. Failed tests debugging is enjoyable with a detailed open mode console. The amount of functionalities is amazing and its usage usually is just as simple as entering one or two methods. Each test is recorded/screenshotted if failed. Adaptation to users' needs is vast - multiple configs if needed, different types of tests (frontend, API), a huge amount of open-source plugins ready to work within two terminal commands, and much more. Documentation, as well as customer support, help greatly with all problems and questions. In 95%, if you have a bug, somewhere there is a solution. However, Cypress has some downsides, like a lack of native parallelization support (which needs an external cloud). Some functionalities (because of the framework architecture) are not supported (iframes) or resolved in a strange way (real mouse hover). Also, the structure of the tests (cy.get...) may be confusing at the start, especially since it is completely different from Selenium syntax. To sum up this review, Cypress is an amazing piece of code, that helped me greatly through the years. It has some specific problems and a unique structure, but when understood and used correctly it is extremally powerful and can be widely implemented to handle apps testing. ----- ### "A step forward for e2e, but still too many bugs for comfort" — 3.0/5 > **Ian Wyatt** | *17 janvier 2020* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The display for your e2e tests at every step is really what i always hoped for an e2e testing software > > **Inconvénients**: Is not reliable. Tests that are ran 3 times in a row, will work 1 or 2 of those times and it has nothing to do with anything you did. Debugging often gives the wrong or useless information. ----- ### "One of the best UI automation testing tools" — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *24 mars 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: One of the most powerful features with Cypress is the test runner. You can else debug any tests with ease with their time machine feature where a user can click on cypress steps to view a screenshot of the app and view the DOM. This has helped us create more confidence than other low/no code solutions. Our web team is loving this and enjoy writing tests\! > > **Inconvénients**: It can be tricky learning how Cypress works and how to effective write tests. The rich documentation helps with the basics and provide recipes for more advanced scenarios. The community outside of the docs are very helpful with any questions. ----- ### "Cypress is a great flexible test framework" — 5.0/5 > **Dale** | *5 octobre 2023* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: constantly evolving, always a new feature in developmenteasy to learn and implement > > **Inconvénients**: not able to use on mobile app development > > having been using Cypress for 6+ years, I still enjoy working with it on a daily basis. ----- Page : 1/4\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/168276/cypress?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/168276/cypress) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées