--- description: Ripple : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Ripple, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ripple - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) > [Ripple](/software/171183/ripple) # Ripple Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/171183/ripple Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/171183/ripple?page=2) > Ripple simplifie le recrutement et la gestion des patients pour les études cliniques et translationnelles. > > Conclusion : 32 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Ripple ? L'éditeur offre ses services aux équipes de recherche clinique et translationnelle dans les universités, CRO, petites entreprises de dispositifs médicaux et entreprises de recherche en tests d'utilisabilité. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 32 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 5.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Ripple Science - **Pays**: Ann Arbor, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 2016 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Chromebook (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, France, Inde, Mexique, Pakistan, Philippines, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Accès mobile - Automatisation du marketing - Communications avec les patients - Conforme HIPAA - Conformité 21 CFR Part 11 - Dossier médical informatisé et partagé - Gestion des campagnes - Gestion des contacts - Gestion des documents - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des leads - Gestion des patients - Gestion des rendez-vous - Importation et exportation de données - Planification - Rappels - Recrutement de patients - Saisie électronique des données - Suivi des patients - Tableau de bord d'activités ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion d'essais cliniques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Logiciels de CRM pour le secteur médical](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30976/healthcare-crm/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.lu/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 2. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 3. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.lu/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 4. [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](https://www.capterra.lu/software/192454/research-manager) — 4.2/5 (112 reviews) 5. [Jeeva eClinical Cloud](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1015289/jeeva-eclinical-cloud) — 4.8/5 (12 reviews) ## Avis ### "This software has facilitates my ability to keep track of and schedule research participants." — 5.0/5 > **Suzy** | *22 juin 2018* | Enseignement supérieur | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is HIPAA compliant, which makes it relatively easy to work with the IRB to get approval to use. It allows for lots of customization for your study design. It is easy to add and remove study team members with different levels of access. You can send reminders for members of the team to do different tasks associated with participants and study events. You can set up study events based on expected dates or that are triggered based on the completion of other study events. There is a registry (database) that houses all the subjects that you have entered. It is easy to query this database and select potential participants into specific studies. > > **Inconvénients**: I would like to see an easier way to input large numbers of potential participants into the registry from a csv file. I would also like to see a more integrated calendar and scheduling system and emailing system. > > It has enhanced my lab productivity and enabled us to keep track of participant recruitment in a much more precise way. ----- ### "Remote Work Made Easy" — 5.0/5 > **Brianna** | *25 mai 2020* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Our team transitioned almost everything to Ripple, before the coronavirus began to affect our research protocols and data collection. Our familiarity with the product prepared us to transition to remote work very smoothly. We have greatly appreciated Ripple's customer support and desire to enhance the system's features. Some of our favorite features include the creation of tasks and the ability to track recruitment and retention strategies. Without Ripple, our administrative team would have a hard time communicating participant information in such detail. > > **Inconvénients**: There is always room for improvement, but it is evident that the Ripple team values customer feedback and is working around the clock to provide as many relevant features as possible. I imagine it is difficult to field the amount of feedback that they receive, but their communication about their goals and progress is fantastic\! > > My team is able to track recruitment and retention, which is very helpful when deciding which community organizations we should put more energy and resources toward. We then thank our community partners for the referrals and strengthen our bond by referring our participants to them. This community networking has played a role in when and how we communicate with participants, another aspect that is well tracked in Ripple. We can also assign Ripple tasks to team members and associate them with specific participants, thus accounting for everyone on our team and in our program. ----- ### "Ripple for Small Studies" — 4.0/5 > **Summer** | *28 mai 2020* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I enjoy using Ripple for our academic research/psychology studies. I enjoy that everything saves automatically and it is generally pretty user friendly and easy to use/teach. > > **Inconvénients**: I think that the searchability of the software could be improved. Sometimes you need to know exactly how to search for something in order for it to show up, even if you know it definitely exists within the database. > > Ripple helped us shift our research study folders from paper to electronic, which provided everyone with equal accessibility and better ease to change and input information as needed. It has helped our team become more organized and focused. ----- ### "Great Interface with Lots of Potential" — 5.0/5 > **Jacob** | *19 mai 2020* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is really easy to use and is optimal for recruitment workflow as well as tracking participant status in a study. It's also great as a quick reference to look at participant contact info. > > **Inconvénients**: The dates logic can be kind of wonky. For example, it normally prompts the next study visit some amount of days after the last visit. This is great, but some visits occur a set amount of time after the baseline, not the last visit, so this can make the set dates really off for some participants. The dashboard could also be more useful in regard to showing a richer database set, such as how many participants completed a study phase for example. ----- ### "As an early adopter of Ripple, I have seen many improvements in functionality and features." — 4.0/5 > **Rachel** | *26 juin 2018* > > **Avantages**: My top three features are: 1. Participant database. We keep participant information (securely) and can use various parameters (e.g., age, gender) to determine if an individual is eligible for a study. We also can track our contact with potential participants, as well as which studies they've participated in (and use this as exclusionary/inclusionary criteria for future studies). 2. Study management. Although there is still room for improvement (see below), it is super helpful to be able to create groups (experimental conditions) and track participants within each group. We also use the task function as reminders and records of the specific tasks associated with each session (e.g., preparation, data entry, follow-up, etc.). 3. Recruitment sources and analysis. The recruitment source database is great for maintaining record of all recruitment sources, contact information, and a log of our contact with each source. It has also been useful to see which sources have yielded the best lines for recruitment, so we can put our limited recruitment resources to best use. > > **Inconvénients**: There are a few features that I would really like to see: 1. Automated session confirmation and reminders. It would be really helpful if we could send scheduled participants a session confirmation (text or email) and then a reminder a day or two before a session. 2. Calendar function that allows us to automatically push de-identified session information (at the time of scheduling) to a cloud calendar so research assistants can see when they have a scheduled session. 3. Random assignment to study conditions. I would love to see a random assignment function to study conditions/groups. 4. More clarity on study set-up parameters (and how to use them to track number of participants by these parameters). There are loads of options for indicating various demographic parameters for a study. For example, indicating number of boy and girl for each age group. However, it isn't intuitive how these nested parameters are trackable within the study dashboard. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/171183/ripple?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/171183/ripple) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées