--- description: ProdPerfect : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur ProdPerfect, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ProdPerfect - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [ProdPerfect](/software/189013/prodperfect) # ProdPerfect Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/189013/prodperfect Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/189013/prodperfect?page=2) > Le système automatise entièrement le développement et la maintenance des tests de bout en bout au niveau du navigateur en utilisant des données utilisateurs temps réel. > > Conclusion : 17 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.9/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise ProdPerfect ? Cette solution s'adresse aux équipes d'ingénierie logicielle qui développent des applications web stratégiques : l'application web en tant que produit, la façon dont un client achète le produit ou la façon dont l'entreprise gère la livraison du produit. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.9/5** | 17 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 100% | (10/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: ProdPerfect - **Pays**: San Francisco, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 2018 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 3.500,00 $US - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Australie, Canada, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (1 au total) - Slack ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (764 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.lu/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (133 reviews) 4. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 5. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) ## Avis ### "A "Software Testing Team as a Service"" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *13 septembre 2022* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: ProdPerfect was exactly what we needed as a small software business that did not want to hire a full time front-end QA engineer. Onboarding was easy because their software automatically measured the user flow in our web app, which is then used to create test cases. The PP team created the test cases and get them up and running without very much input from me. Once testing was operational, we held a highly effective weekly meeting series to discuss the system use, testing issues, and new test cases. > > **Inconvénients**: The ProdPerfect team has good handle on what is needed in the roadmap. In general it would be ideal for the test execution cases to be run in parallel with no-dependency executions. This is something they have been working on but is not ready yet. Not having this feature means that testing of each case is done in series which takes more time and there are some reporting challenges with failures. For example the JavaScript environment is not aware of which test case is running, so the test case ID cannot be included in logging reports (e.g. Sentry) > > I had a very positive, overall experience with ProdPerfect's product and team members. My aim was to achieve frontend test coverage without hiring a full time QA engineer and I was able to do this with ProdPefect and the cost was about 50% of what a QA engineer would have cost. Considering the comparison to a fulltime engineer, the rest of the Continuous Integration system comes for "free" in the sense of having the hourly testing compute engaged + a pass fail dashboard for viewing results. ----- ### "Unbelievable customer success team meets an incredibly valuable product offering" — 5.0/5 > **Matt** | *10 septembre 2019* | Ressources humaines | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The worst part about setting up an outsourced QA team is training them on the flows users go through - simultaneously how users behave and where they are interacting with the product. The highest value proposition of ProdPerfect to me is the tracking beacon that lets them not only figure out what flows to monitor from the start, but as we launch feature changes, ProdPerfect notices the change in behavior and builds out the next suite of tests. It's incredibly hands off but offering us continued and accurate protection. > > **Inconvénients**: The data viz tool to look at how users are behaving on the site could use some tuning. It's a bit information overload and unintuitive to manipulate to make it useful. Luckily, I have never had to actually use it and after talking to the team at ProdPerfect I was relieved to know I didn't ever actually have to use it - and they're working on a better way to represent the heaps of data they have on our user behavior already. > > The experience has been extremely positive. Every step of the sales journey and onboarding has been surprisingly delightful: we were offered a free trial for our first month \_after\_ the tests had been written and integrated into our CI/CD tool, the account manager on our team has been down to Earth and accommodating to some of our shifting needs, and their tech team has been really responsive to feedback on how the integration could be improved and worked with us on testing out new features which we liked. It's also worth noting that ProdPerfect hangs out in a shared Slack channel with us, which has a bot reporting test runs that pass (or sometimes fail, whoopsies). In that channel we can click on a report to view a video of what went wrong, talk to the ProdPerfect team to communicate if it was an intentional change or not, and pretty quick any changes to our tests can get rolled out and we'll kick off another run. It really feels like we have an integrated QA team that has successfully caught a handful of issues for us before they make it to production. Definitely worth it in my opinion. ----- ### "Remove regression from your list problems" — 4.0/5 > **John** | *22 septembre 2019* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: PP removes a class of problem from the list of things I need to "do something" about. Regression is a no-win situation for eng management. Do it well and nobody notices. Screw it up and you never live it down. > > **Inconvénients**: Lack of UI/visibility. If you deal with regression internally you have the same problem ... that you're doing a lot of work that doesn't visibly contribute to forward movement. Buy ProdPerfect and the only visible indicator of effort is a product that works. > > ProdPerfect saves us an FTE in QA. They're responsive and well-integrated with the team. We ship bugs occasionally, but not in the code that ProdPerfect covers which, by design, is the highest usage parts of the product. ----- ### "ProdPerfect is our test automation team" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *14 août 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: ProdPerfect has offered us an excellent hybrid of tools + services. Their data collection 'secret sauce' made it possible for them to quickly develop a front-end test automation suite that covers the majority of actions that our users take with our web-facing dashboards, and to update these tests as our products evolve. Their delivery team has been attentive and proactive, iterating and tightening up the test logic to handle the inevitable flaky tests that come with front-end test automation. The overall effect is that we get wide test coverage, that we can run with every deployment to staging \& production, and that enables us to deploy frequently and make bold changes to the underlying software, with ProdPerfect as our end-to-end safety net. > > **Inconvénients**: As with any test automation tool, there are false alarms. But the ProdPerfect team has responded quickly and independently to these, mitigating this concern. It has taken longer than we'd like to bring up new test suites. Part of this is the process of data collection, to build up a map of what real users are doing on our sites. On the positive side of this, they have required surprisingly little direction or guidance in building up the tests, which has allowed us to keep our focus on building new features. > > We have been very satisfied, and our partnership with ProdPerfect has allowed us to move quickly and maintain a high level of stability and quality in our user-facing web applications. ----- ### "The no-brainer, cost-effective solution for our QA" — 5.0/5 > **Tom** | *11 août 2019* | Logistique et chaîne d'approvisionnement | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Setup is hands on where you want it to be, hands off where you want it to be. ProdPerfect determined which tests would be the most effective, wrote and delivered them to us, but we got to decide exactly how they fit into our pipelines. - Test maintenance and writing is completely automatic – we know the outcome of the tests that are written but don't need to be involved in the creation or upkeep of them. - Tests are high quality – important workflows have been saved on multiple occasions now from being broken due to the suite catching issues that weren't caught by our unit tests. - Communication is top notch – very professional, quick to respond, friendly. - Multiple times cheaper than doing it ourselves. We would have either had to hire QA or have existing engineers context switch to writing regression tests alongside regular development and unit tests. > > **Inconvénients**: This sounds ridiculous but we really don't have any. We got exactly what we expected. > > The pros section probably summarizes it best – but they are high quality tests that are maintained entirely by the ProdPerfect platform that cover our highest trafficked workflows and are kept up to to date. They are integrated perfectly into our pipelines and provide a final layer of safety in the deployment process at a cost that is significantly less than we would have spent to do it ourselves. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/189013/prodperfect?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/189013/prodperfect) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Données structurées