--- description: RevenueCat : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur RevenueCat, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: RevenueCat - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des abonnements](/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) > [RevenueCat](/software/212540/revenuecat) # RevenueCat Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/212540/revenuecat Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) > La plateforme d'abonnement pour les applications mobiles > > Conclusion : 47 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise RevenueCat ? Applications mobiles ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 47 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: RevenueCat ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Canada, Espagne, France, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Portugal, Royaume-Uni, Russie, Suède, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Catalogue de produits - Facturation récurrente de plusieurs périodes - Facturation récurrente et des abonnements - Gestion des abonnements - Gestion des annulations - Gestion des remises - Inscriptions et intégrations - Logiciels de gestion des souscriptions - Options de paiement multiples - Portail libre-service - Prise en compte des revenus - Suivi et analyse de l'utilisation - Third-Party Integrations ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Adjust - Amazon S3 - Amplitude - AppsFlyer - Branch - CleverTap - Google Cloud - Intercom - Mixpanel - OneSignal - Segment - Slack - SplitMetrics Acquire - Stripe - Tenjin ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des abonnements](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Gestion des abonnements](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) - [Logiciels pour éditeurs de livres et gestion des abonnements](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) - [Logiciels de facturation récurrente](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30927/recurring-billing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion du SaaS](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31639/saas-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Chargebee](https://www.capterra.lu/software/131433/chargebee) — 4.2/5 (104 reviews) 2. [Subbly](https://www.capterra.lu/software/144363/subbly) — 4.8/5 (216 reviews) 3. [Stripe Billing](https://www.capterra.lu/software/178774/stripe-billing) — 4.7/5 (203 reviews) 4. [SuiteDash](https://www.capterra.lu/software/154949/suitedash) — 4.8/5 (612 reviews) 5. [DealHub](https://www.capterra.lu/software/172031/dealhub) — 4.7/5 (95 reviews) ## Avis ### "Using RevenueCat server from app inception to release to the App Store" — 5.0/5 > **Sudipto** | *16 juillet 2021* | Loisirs, voyage et tourisme | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The integration mechanism into swift code base is detailed in RevenueCat docs. This made it possible to successfully integrate it. It is very helpful that testing in the sandbox is possible using a sandbox user > > **Inconvénients**: The concepts of Entitlements, Offerings, Products is difficult to memorize. It's good that RevenueCat has readily available detailed documentation to cover these concepts > > The integration is stable. Once coded, I seldom need to revisit it. So, it's now a seamless experience for my users and the app ----- ### "Simple Solution for In-App Subscriptions" — 5.0/5 > **Dakota** | *20 janvier 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: RevenueCat made it really easy for us to implement In-App Subscriptions for our app with absolutely no prior experience in taking payments on mobile devices. It saved us the upfront cost of paying for our own server to verify purchases along with the potential months of headache to handle all of the different scenarios you need to plan for and handle with in-app purchases (buying, renewing, pausing, canceling, etc.) Being able to pull information directly from RevenueCat instead of hard-coding it into our app also meant we could have a single source of truth (the App Store/Google Play Store) where we would update our available products. > > **Inconvénients**: The only thing I wasn't a fan of (which has since been changed) was the payment model. When we first integrated it, the payment model was a fixed monthly rate versus the percentage cut that it is now. Extremely useful features like webhooks weren't accessible for us at the time because of this, but as I stated they've now changed this. Because of that, I cannot name anything I dislike about RevenueCat. > > We turned to RevenueCat because of the hassle that exists trying to verify purchases manually. Doing this ourselves would mean setting up a server, handling all the different cases across the App Store and Play Store, and making sure this server is maintained and always live. For a small team like ours, this just wasn't viable and any potential money "saved" doing it ourselves would be lost in the time we would spend setting up our own solution. That would also mean extra time before an app can be released which would increase our time to market. RevenueCat handled everything we needed it to and took about a week to fully integrate. ----- ### "Great idea, terrible execution and terrible support" — 1.0/5 > **Robert** | *12 janvier 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the idea of it, and the fact that it could consolidate.your monetisation strategy. (When it works correctly) > > **Inconvénients**: The support is terrible, the documentation is terrible. > > It takes a lot for me to leave a bad review. RevenueCat is a great idea, but poorly executed. The documentation is scatty, their API is inconsistent, there has been 2 sets of downtime since I signed up and the level of support from RevenueCat is absolutely unacceptable. For a company that takes a 1% cut of your revenue forever—potentially up to thousands of dollars per month—this is beyond ridiculous. 5-10 business days for an email response? If I’m lucky, maybe 2-3 days. Their documentation is a joke, basically saying to try the obvious and failing that “Go ask someone else on the forums” And their forums? Just a graveyard of unanswered posts with people begging for updates. I’ve been stuck trying to fix Android issues for over a week. I’m confident my setup is correct, but still, nothing works. Getting any kind of timely help from RevenueCat is like pulling teeth. I even wasted time in one of their Q\&A sessions on the recommendation of their support team, which was nothing more than a shameless product pitch. Their exact words: “We aren’t answering implementation questions today.” despite half of the people on the session voting for implementation help. It’s clear to me that RevenueCat doesn’t prioritise supporting their customers. Their strategy is obvious—sign up as many people as possible, then leave them hanging. When our success is literally their success, how can they justify this level of neglect? It’s infuriating. ----- ### "Best service for in-app purchases" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *23 janvier 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The simplicity to setup in-app purchases for mobile apps and the pricing > > **Inconvénients**: Really I don't know what to say here. Maybe the cheaper plan could have a bit more features? > > Really happy with it, I like their documentations and the ease of use ----- ### "I Need RevenueCat" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *15 décembre 2020* | E-learning | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I have to chose 1 thing? I can't. 1. I love how you built this for hardworking app developers. You saw the unmet need and you filled it with love. 2. I love your response from your team when I have a question or problem. 3. I love how you offer a very affordable service and when we want more features you hook us so we have to pay more but we like it ;) > > **Inconvénients**: Better communication with Apple when we update our price of subscription. Have that reflect on our charts side. > > Over all I am 100% happy. I can continue to be happy when you keep iterating as we all must in the subscription world. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/212540/revenuecat) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées