Note moyenne

  • Note globale
    3,9 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3,9 /5
  • Service client
    4,5 /5

En savoir plus sur SpiraPlan

SpiraPlan est un système de gestion de programme agile clé en main qui permet de planifier, gérer et suivre vos programmes et vos ressources.

En savoir plus sur SpiraPlan

16 avis affichés

Jim R.
Principal Consultant
Logiciels, Auto-entrepreneur
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 04/08/2017

"Very satisfied with SpiraTeam's requirements management features and functions."

Commentaires: I can easily manage software requirements for any size software development project.

Avantages: The value for the money. I primarily use SpiraTeam for requirements management. From that perspective alone, SpiraTeam's functionality is as good or better than IBM/Rational, HP, or ReqTool. To have all the other functionality (test management, task management, Kanban, reporting, etc.) include in the package is a true value-add.

Inconvénients: It's a minor inconvenience: response time when first logging-in to the system is somewhat slow. But once the system responds to my login attempt, response time is acceptable - at least as good as other cloud-based systems I use.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 04/08/2017
Dennis L.
Functional Analyst
Appareils médicaux, 51-200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 1 à 5 mois
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    4 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    8/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 13/12/2019

"Our R&D - managed, at last!"

Commentaires: We used a maintenance release for one of our medical devices as a trial. Spira allowed very easy control of Requirements and Test artifacts and especially traceability and traceability reporting, which is vital for e.g. the FDA submissions.

Avantages: * Easy to set up (meaning the project templates, users, customizable fields, etc.)
* Very good integration possibilities with other tools
* Attractive GUI
* Great customization possibilities for reports
* REST API available and well documented

Inconvénients: * Support for reviews is a bit rudimentary - this is, IMO, the weakest part of the tool. We'd prefer to have the possibility to submit sets of artifacts for review, defined review groups, and allow adding Approvals and Discussion threads (similar to e.g. Gitlab)

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 13/12/2019
Neil P.
President
Logiciels, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 6 à 12 mois
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    Sans note
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 23/11/2020

"Very comprehensive"

Commentaires: Reporting and controlling testing workflow.

Avantages: Flexibility on configuration plus control features useful for regulated clients.

Inconvénients: Workflow slightly difficult to configure.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 23/11/2020
Bernardo B.
Senior Manager
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    3 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    9/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 01/08/2017

"We've used SpiraTeam in my company for over 5 years and it is great tool for Test Management."

Avantages: I'd like to have versioning for requirements and others, Faster UI and Navigation. Dashboards with all the needed reports and graphs

Inconvénients: When lots of test cases are created the app gets sloppy and confused
Missing dashboards and better reports

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 01/08/2017
Dieter S.
Software Engineer
Automatisation industrielle, 201-500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 16/09/2020

"Use of SPIRA"

Commentaires: I´m tracking our development processes for a waterfall/V-Modell process

Avantages: Easy to administrate. Ready to go after installation. Web access. Easy to handle.

Inconvénients: Editable workflows not for all items. Baselining comes this year.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 16/09/2020
Brian K.
Quality Assurance Specialist
Papier et produits forestiers, 1 001-5 000 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    9/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 27/07/2017

"Great product for managing your software development projects at a reasonable price"

Commentaires: A full ALM for our company to support a major multi year ERP implementation. Minimal setup and training was required and the tool has proved reliable for us.

Avantages: When evaluating solutions for an Application Lifecycle Management tool it became clear to me that the choice would be SpiraTeam (including SpiraPlan). For the price to feature ratio, it could do everything and more than we would need. With the ability to just add additionally licenses as our team grew it provided the flexibility we needed.
The support team at Inflectra is also top notch. Any time I had a question/issue, they were there to help in a quick and friendly manner.

Inconvénients: Some areas of the application UI can be a little clunky and unintuitive at times. Inflectra does take user feedback seriously though and I have been able to work with them to resolve most issues we faced.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 27/07/2017
Peter B.
Managing Director
Services et technologies de l'information, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    4 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    9/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 16/09/2020

"So Easy to Implement"

Commentaires: Excellent! I've used other ALMs in the past and this is, by far, the easiest and most flexible of them. It just makes sense!

Avantages: The software is highly intuitive and incredibly easy to implement within either a new or structured environment. Set-up and configuration to meet my business needs was simple and the online manuals and YouTube guides were a real asset. The product is easy to customise and use and you can have a relatively non-technical team using it in no time, even business people!

Inconvénients: The Reporting suite could be better. It's a little clunky to customise but the out-of-the-box reports are more than adequate to get started and will, in most instances, meet all of a Project's needs.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 16/09/2020
Rian M.
Software Manager
Hôpitaux et soins de santé, 201-500 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    4 /5
  • Support client
    4 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    10/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 10/12/2019

"Spiraplan"

Commentaires: overall, very positive.

Avantages: Ability to customize to my company's needs. Ability to link with other programs for automated testing

Inconvénients: some basic features: unable to link an incident to at test case; can only link an incident to an individual test step. When using the main search feature, you have to use caps to search for an incident, task, test case by the IN:XXXX

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 10/12/2019
Charles H.
CEO
Logiciels, 2-10 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus de deux ans
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    9/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017

"The tech support was very responsive to help me to set the environment. So impressed."

Commentaires: Effective work process

Avantages: It is a worry free software for software development projects for me. Packed features allow the team to grow.

Inconvénients: Better integrated source code management features for code review. Online development environment could be great as well to further simplify the development operations

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017
Stephanie B.
QA Manager
  • Note globale
    3 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    Sans note
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    Sans note
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 20/10/2011

"Quick review of Spira-Test"

Commentaires: Well let's face it. You don't charge a lot of money.
However, for an extra grand + change I can get MS Test Manager.
Both yours and that product are under evaluation.
I think you have the start of a good program.
I'll keep evaluating and if the check comes in the mail: you win.

Avantages: I like the ability to connect the requirements to bugs to tests.
It's reasonably priced.
Your support team is very responsive
The logo if pretty good too

Inconvénients: We won't use the bug tracker. Not feature rich enough.
The description field is just too small to be useful.
See Bugzilla which is free. That is what we are going to continue using.
For Requirements, we won't use that either except maybe at a very high level. My Product manager is looking for a better description page. We use MS Word and that allows up to view the requirement in full. Our requirements are multiple pages. What you offer is too limiting.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 20/10/2011
Alan B.
Director
  • Note globale
    5 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    Sans note
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    Sans note
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 10/03/2014

"Great product - especially good for remote project management"

Commentaires: I have used SpiraPlan for several years to help manage projects. It is a very stable and reliable piece of software. I find it great for managing tasks for staff working remote from the office. It took a bit of getting used to at first as there are several ways of setting up projects. However once you get the hang of it and find the way it works for you it is great. I really like the import / export functions to Microsoft Excel and MS Project - very useful. Also the ability to set up you own custom fields gives it a lot of flexibility. I have used several other software products over the years so have used both good and not so good ones, and I would thoroughly recommend SpiraPlan.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 10/03/2014
Faisal H.
Principal QA Engineer
Services d'information, 11-50 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: plus d'un an
  • Note globale
    3 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3 /5
  • Support client
    2 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    4 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    5/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 31/07/2017

"Good ALM for startups"

Commentaires: It was a great option at a time the company hadn't selected a requirements management agile tool. Ever since we moved to JIRA, it was best to move to the much simpler, speedier, easy to integrate, TestRail tool.

Avantages: A much improved interface UI for testing and positively best option for requirements management in a testing tool

Inconvénients: very slow access on shared hosting - windows server only - very difficult to integrate with 3rd party APIs

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 31/07/2017
Jan S.
Director
Automobile
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 1 à 5 mois
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    4 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3 /5
  • Support client
    3 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    3 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    6/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017

"Easy to use"

Commentaires: Overviee

Avantages: Dashboard is so simple and complex. Reports export is usefull and usable. We are happy to use this sw.

Inconvénients: Individual setup seems to me as complicated. Many features is not used due hide somewhere. Need to be more user friendly and intuative.

Réponse de l'éditeur

envoyé par Inflectra le 28/07/2017

Thanks for the feedback, we are working to simplify the user experience for new users and hide certain advanced features until users are ready for them.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017
Sriramasundararajan R.
Vice President
Services et technologies de l'information, 51-200 employés
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 1 à 5 mois
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    3 /5
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    8/10
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017

"Great overall."

Commentaires: One stop experience for the entire ALM.

Avantages: Like the one stop at a software for entire application lifecycle. The licensing fee model was also good.

Inconvénients: User interface could be improved similar to Version in agile user stories or even Trello.

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 28/07/2017
Bhawna D.
Spira
  • Note globale
    3 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    3 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    Sans note
  • Support client
    5 /5
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    Sans note
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 26/09/2011

"New Tool - central repository"

Commentaires: Good and Useful

Avantages: New tool , 1 tool for multi functions

Inconvénients: I am new to thistool so need to learn alot

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 26/09/2011
Chris D.
Manager RD Projects
Temps d'utilisation du produit: 1 à 5 mois
  • Note globale
    4 /5
  • Facilité d'utilisation
    5 /5
  • Fonctionnalités
    5 /5
  • Support client
    Sans note
  • Rapport qualité-prix
    5 /5
  • Probabilité de recommander le produit
    Sans note
  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 27/07/2017

"Excellent customer support"

Avantages: Full featured

Inconvénients: A little complex

  • Source de l'avis 
  • Publié le 27/07/2017