--- description: Continuum GRC : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Continuum GRC, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Continuum GRC - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion intégrée de risques](/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) > [Continuum GRC](/software/1024479/continuum-grc) # Continuum GRC Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/1024479/continuum-grc Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1024479/continuum-grc?page=2) > Continuum GRC propose la solution d'évaluation autorisée FedRAMP \& StateRAMP pour les normes mondiales telles que SOC 2, 27001, 800-53, etc. > > Conclusion : 26 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Continuum GRC ? CE N'EST PAS UN GRC (GOVERNANCE, RISK AND COMPLIANCE) HABITUEL MSP (Managed Services Provider), évaluateurs, entreprises, agences et autodidactes utilisent tous Continuum GRC pour remplacer les outils, modèles et processus manuels existants en place afin de prendre en charge les exigences en matière de risque de conformité. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 26 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Continuum GRC ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 5.800,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, arabe, bulgare, chinois, chinois traditionnel, danois, espagnol, estonien, finnois, français, grec, hongrois, indonésien, italien, japonais, norvégien, néerlandais, polonais, portugais, roumain, russe, slovaque, suédois - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade, Belgique et 207 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion des audits - Gestion des contrôles internes - Gestion des documents - Gestion des fournisseurs - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des risques - Gestion des risques liés à l'informatique - Gestion des risques opérationnels - Gestion des réponses - Gestion des stratégies - Gestion des évaluations - Notation des risques - Risk Analysis - Tableau de bord - Évaluation des risques ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion intégrée de risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de gestion intégrée de risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31545/integrated-risk-management/software) - [Gestion des risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30656/grc/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Scrut Automation](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1052809/scrut) — 4.9/5 (139 reviews) 2. [Hyperproof](https://www.capterra.lu/software/202536/hyperproof) — 4.8/5 (116 reviews) 3. [AuditBoard](https://www.capterra.lu/software/148230/soxhub) — 4.7/5 (414 reviews) 4. [Okta](https://www.capterra.lu/software/119653/okta) — 4.7/5 (944 reviews) 5. [Onspring](https://www.capterra.lu/software/138931/audit-software) — 4.8/5 (105 reviews) ## Avis ### "Streamlining IT Audits with Precision and Flexibility" — 5.0/5 > **Adam** | *12 mars 2024* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Streamlined Audit Workflow: One of the standout features of this platform is its ability to streamline the entire audit process. From planning to execution and reporting, every step feels intuitive and efficient. The platform's user-friendly interface and logical workflow design have saved me countless hours, allowing me to focus more on analysis and less on administrative tasks. Simplified Multi-Audit Environments: Managing evidentiary documents across multiple audits has always been a cumbersome process. This platform's shared evidentiary management system is a game-changer. It allows for easy access and organization of audit evidence, reducing redundancy and improving accuracy. This feature alone has enhanced my productivity and significantly reduced the potential for errors. > > **Inconvénients**: The MFA entry box doesn't take the Enter keystroke for login, you have to click the button. That's the thing I like least. > > This is a robust tool that stands out for its ability to streamline audit workflows, simplify management in multi-audit environments, and adapt to user feedback. It has been instrumental in enhancing my productivity and the overall quality of my audit processes. I highly recommend it to any professional looking for an effective solution to manage their audit workflows more efficiently. ----- ### "Review by IH 2025" — 4.0/5 > **Isabelle** | *16 juin 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: the new version is user friendly. Easy to understand and use. navigation between controls is made easy > > **Inconvénients**: The bugs at the beginning (uploaded documents not appearing, no possibility to upload a file instead of individual documents) The lack of possibility of 'full view' and extraction of all controls as written by us for traceability and follow-up purposes Being obliged to upload over and aver again the same documents / evidence under different controls > > Good. Enables easier collaboration between the stakeholders. correspondence between SOC2 and ISO27 to be confirmed during next audit cycle. ----- ### "Successful CMMC Certification, But Significant Usability Improvements Needed" — 3.0/5 > **Dillon** | *24 juillet 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 4.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Continuum GRC provided a structured framework for working through a complex CMMC Level 2 assessment and helped centralize controls, evidence, and assessment activities in a single platform. The ability to map documentation to controls, track progress across assessment domains, and maintain a repository of supporting artifacts was valuable during the early stages of our compliance effort. For organizations beginning a CMMC assessment, the platform can provide useful structure and visibility into requirements, documentation needs, and overall assessment progression. > > **Inconvénients**: Several features reduced efficiency during our assessment effort and ultimately limited our reliance on the platform as the engagement matured. The AI functionality was the most disappointing aspect of the platform. Responses were frequently inaccurate, lacked meaningful context, and in many cases appeared unrelated to the controls or questions being addressed. After attempting to use the feature across multiple controls, we found the recommendations unreliable and ultimately stopped using it. Assessment previews do not display all question content, specifically all \[a\] controls, unless users enter edit mode. This created unnecessary navigation and made reviews and edits more cumbersome than necessary. Evidence management also became difficult as the assessment progressed. Many controls require the same supporting documentation, yet evidence often had to be uploaded or referenced repeatedly, creating duplicate entries and unnecessary file clutter. Over time, this made the platform increasingly difficult to navigate and maintain. Spreadsheet previews were also limited. Excel files often had to be downloaded and opened locally to properly review content, and secondary worksheets were not easily viewable within the platform. In addition, the platform's completion and readiness percentages often felt misleading. While score increases provided a visible measure of platform activity, they did not consistently reflect actual assessment readiness. We frequently found ourselves performing substantial revisions and documentation improvements despite relatively high completion percentages, making it difficult to determine how prepared we truly were for assessment. Finally, module terminology and workflow organization can be confusing. For example, control implementation statements and other pre-assessment activities are entered within the "Executive Summary" module rather than the more intuitively named "Pre-Assessment" module, making navigation less intuitive than expected. > > Our overall experience with Continuum GRC was mixed. The platform provided structure for organizing assessment activities and tracking compliance requirements throughout our CMMC Level 2 certification effort. However, several core features limited its effectiveness during day-to-day assessment work. As the assessment matured, we found ourselves relying increasingly on processes outside the platform for developing, refining, and reviewing control documentation. Features such as AI-assisted guidance, evidence management, document previews, and assessment scoring often fell short of expectations, reducing their practical value during the engagement. While the platform helped establish an initial framework and ultimately supported a successful CMMC Level 2 certification outcome, significant improvements in usability, workflow efficiency, feature maturity, and evidence management would improve its effectiveness for organizations managing large and complex compliance initiatives. Thank you\! ----- ### "Align Continuum Review" — 4.0/5 > **Erika** | *19 mai 2026* | Compagnies aériennes/Aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: We liked how interactive the platform was, and it showed the progress in a very visual manner. We especially like that if we had any doubts, we could add a note, and it would get sent to the team and vice versa. > > **Inconvénients**: One team member had a problem opening the platform, it could have been a loading issue but besides that it worked fine. > > We liked the platform as it was easy to use and met all the requirements needed from us to clearly paste our information and view notes from Lazarus. ----- ### "Major benefit in our pursuit of State(Gov)RAMP certification" — 5.0/5 > **Jon** | *23 avril 2025* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Intuitive and well organized tool, was a huge help in our efforts to become StateRAMP (GovRAMP) certified. Provided training was comprehensive and we were off and running. > > **Inconvénients**: Initial performance wasn't great but was addressed shortly after we went live. No major issues were experienced. > > Found the team at Continuum GRC to be incredibly easy to work with and very responsive when we had questions or needed custom reporting. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1024479/continuum-grc?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1024479/continuum-grc) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées