--- description: Track : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Track, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Track - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des tâches](/directory/10030/task-management/software) > [Track](/software/110474/track-alm) # Track Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/110474/track-alm Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/110474/track-alm?page=2) > Le logiciel de gestion de tâches Allegra offre une combinaison unique de fonctionnalités, de méthodologie et de facilité d'utilisation. > > Conclusion : 7 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.9/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Track ? Entreprises d'ingénierie et agences gouvernementales développant des produits contenant des logiciels. Concepteurs d'automobiles, de systèmes embarqués, de dispositifs médicaux, d'électronique, d'avions et d'automatisation. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.9/5** | 7 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 5.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 5.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 100% | (10/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Steinbeis - **Pays**: Korb, Allemagne - **Fondé**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 10,00 € - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais, espagnol - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne ## Fonctionnalités - Définition des priorités - Gestion des affectations - Gestion des délais - Gestion des flux de travail - Notes et commentaires - Outils de collaboration - Sub-Task Management - Suivi des projets - Suivi du temps - Task Editing ## Intégrations (2 au total) - Slack - Zapier ## Ressources d'aide - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des tâches](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10030/task-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Microsoft To Do](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1010347/wunderlist) — 4.6/5 (3063 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 3. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.lu/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5059 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23488 reviews) 5. [Asana](https://www.capterra.lu/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13547 reviews) ## Avis ### "Perfect balance between ease of use and complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Szilard** | *4 juillet 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - easy to use - doesn't miss a feature, has all I neede > > **Inconvénients**: - once you get used with it it's really working as expected > > During my 12+ years of programming experience, I have used several issue tracking tools. I use Scrum in my projects. Track+ not only keeps track of issues but it actually guides our Agile development cycle. From a developer point of view, the product owner can continuously monitor the project's status. Easy to learn, simple to use. I don't think that I would ever switch to another system after using Track+. ----- ### "Full-featured and easy to learn" — 5.0/5 > **Ramona** | *3 juillet 2019* | Impression | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Allegra is very easy to learn and it enables to customize various features to meet the specific needs. Support people answer quickly and are helpful. > > **Inconvénients**: Can't think of anything in particular, everything has worked as expected and fast, I was able to find my way quickly within the features. Maybe the fact that there are some functionalities that I don't make use of yet, but I need to ask about them. > > We were looking for a tool with a quick learning curve. Project management systems are pretty complex software pieces. I suppose that it's not easy to keep track of all the aspects needed to be considered while also preserving the simplicity of use. Over the years I've learned that if someone is not able to learn how to use an issue tracking system effortlessly if it is too complicated, people are not going to use it and go back to emails. That's just not the case with Track+ and this is what I like the most about it. Another thing that I appreciate is that it allows me to customize the issues' life cycle based on a desired specific workflow. It has some advanced settings for this purpose, still, they are not easy to set at the first glimpse, so we've asked the customer support, and they helped promptly. The general look and feel are very appealing, and the features are structured in a very simple, intuitive way. ----- ### "Very powerful tracking tool with slight improvement potential in user interface" — 4.0/5 > **Jochen** | *5 janvier 2016* > > \+ Track+ V5.0.xx is very versatile + you can configure it to do almost anything related to tracking + wiki feature included +supports workflows, freely-configureable item types... - user interface is slightly unintuitive (but surely no showstopper\!) ----- ### "Project management tool with special features for embedded systems projects" — 5.0/5 > **R.** | *27 octobre 2015* > > We are using this tool to manage our master students term projects. Having to support a lot of projects dealing with real-time systems development, we couldn't handle this situation without this tool. We have integrated the system with Subversion repositories and a Jenkins CI server. The Gantt diagram permits easy planning and tracking. The ALM support permits us to do requirements and test management all in one place. We have configured the user interface to just contain required functionality which makes it easy for our students to get started. We can show them classical project management, Scrum, and Kanban. It takes a little while to understand the tools' philosophy with RACI matrix support, workspaces, and workspace types. The extensive configurability can be a bit overwhelming at first, but it pays quickly. Documentation is good, and the support has been very helpful. Overall I would say, this is an effective and useful tool to manage lots of engineering projects simultaneously. ----- ### "Cool Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Hunor** | *23 juin 2019* | Génie civil | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It is an advanced tool that we use on a daily basis to keep up with the workload. Every time I am thinking if Allegra does a certain thing or has a certain feature, whatever I try to do, it simply works as expected. That's a good sign that the UI/UX is well made. The best thing about Allegra is the ability to plan the tasks precisely with the Gantt view, and have a deep view of the existing project status. I make great use of the resource management view to plan the time of the resources involved in the project. It has advanced KPIs, with multiple (almost 20) cockpits showing various project aspects like overtime, activity stream, velocity chart, etc). > > **Inconvénients**: You can "play" with all sorts of scenarios within project management. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/110474/track-alm?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/110474/track-alm) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées