--- description: GitHub : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur GitHub, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Développement d'applications](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github Page : 1/248\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github?page=2) > GitHub permet aux équipes de développement de collaborer, d'examiner et de gérer le code au sein d'un pipeline DevOps et d'une sécurité de code intégrée. > > Conclusion : 6178 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.8/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise GitHub ? Développement de logiciels tout à la fois pour les start-up de petite taille et pour les grandes entreprises. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.8/5** | 6178 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Microsoft - **Pays**: Redmond, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1975 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 4,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Arabie saoudite, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Biélorussie, Brésil, Bulgarie, Canada, Chine, Corée du Sud, Croatie, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Hongrie, Inde et 27 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse de la vulnérabilité - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Débogage - Déploiement continu - Développement collaboratif - Environnement de développement intégré - Examen du code - Gestion de la configuration - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des backlogs - Gestion des billets - Gestion des problèmes - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tâches - Gestion des versions - Interface graphique - Intégration continue - Livraison continue - Monitoring - Outils de collaboration - Partage des fichiers - Real-Time Analytics - Reporting et suivi de projet - Saisie de bug et de problème - Suivi de la progression des tâches - Suivi des bugs - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des étapes - Sécurité des applications - Tableau de bord ## Intégrations (14 au total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Développement d'applications](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Développement d'applications](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de projet à but non lucratif](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Gestion de projets](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Intégration continue](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15381 reviews) 2. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.lu/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.lu/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1221 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.lu/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.lu/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2231 reviews) ## Avis ### "Un outil essentiel pour la gestion de projets de développement" — 4.0/5 > **Julia** | *29 avril 2026* | Immobilier | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: J’apprécie particulièrement la gestion des versions avec Git, la collaboration efficace entre équipes, ainsi que les fonctionnalités comme les pull requests et l’intégration continue. > > **Inconvénients**: L’interface peut être complexe pour les débutants, et certaines fonctionnalités avancées nécessitent du temps pour être maîtrisées. > > Mon expérience avec GitHub est très positive. Il me permet de gérer efficacement mes projets, de collaborer facilement avec d’autres développeurs et de suivre les modifications du code de manière structurée. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 avril 2026* | Sécurité et enquêtes | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Inconvénients**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable but stingy github actions capacity" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *26 mars 2026* | Cabinets médicaux | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I appreciate the github actions, which allows me to run automated testing for each one of my pull requests. > > **Inconvénients**: It's annoying that I am not able to have unlimited github actions for private repos that I pay for. It's limited to a cap, which I think is a little stingy considering that I am a paying customer. I would have expected the same caps as public github repos. > > Overall, the experience is great. It's a very convenience way to store my git repos online, and I can trust that the data will be there to stay since it is owned by Microsoft. I've have my github for almost 10 years. Some years I am more active than others, but I can always count on the experience being consistent and reliable. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 juin 2025* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Inconvénients**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6 avril 2026* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- Page : 1/248\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/129067/github) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Données structurées