--- description: ReqView : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur ReqView, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des exigences](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Outil simple et puissant de saisie et de gestion des exigences dans lequel vous pouvez facilement analyser la traçabilité et collaborer hors ligne. > > Conclusion : 49 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise ReqView ? ReqView est la solution pour les entreprises des secteurs médicaux, aérospatiaux, de la défense, automobile, etc. qui doivent se conformer aux normes du secteur. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 49 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.1/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Eccam - **Fondé**: 2004 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 430,00 € - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Chine, Inde, Japon, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Tchéquie, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Définition des priorités - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion des changements ## Intégrations (11 au total) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Gestion informatique](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.lu/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.lu/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.lu/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## Avis ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25 août 2025* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Inconvénients**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7 août 2025* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Inconvénients**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5 mars 2026* | Compagnies aériennes/Aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Inconvénients**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *4 novembre 2022* | Construction de matériel ferroviaire | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **Inconvénients**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *12 décembre 2024* | Aviation et industrie aéronautique | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **Inconvénients**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées