--- description: Ansible Tower : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Ansible Tower, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ansible Tower - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Développement d'applications](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Ansible Tower](/software/149875/ansible-tower) # Ansible Tower Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/149875/ansible-tower Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/149875/ansible-tower?page=2) > Déployer des applications. Gérer des systèmes. Simplifier la complexité. Ansible vous aide à construire une base solide pour les DevOps. > > Conclusion : 47 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 47 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Red Hat ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Débogage - Tests de compatibilité ## Intégrations (18 au total) - AppDynamics - Dynatrace - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - IBM Z - InfluxDB - Jenkins - LogicMonitor - Microsoft Azure - NGINX - OpenStack - SAP S/4HANA Cloud - ServiceNow - Splunk Enterprise ... et 3 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Développement d'applications](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [SAP NetWeaver](https://www.capterra.lu/software/65750/sap-netweaver) — 4.5/5 (54 reviews) 2. [Django](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1017122/django) — 4.6/5 (18 reviews) 3. [Aspose.Total](https://www.capterra.lu/software/154165/aspose-total) — 4.4/5 (25 reviews) 4. [Mobincube](https://www.capterra.lu/software/150984/mobincube) — 2.1/5 (7 reviews) 5. [AppGini](https://www.capterra.lu/software/165689/appgini) — 5.0/5 (4 reviews) ## Avis ### "Best web based solution for automation and available as an open source platform." — 5.0/5 > **vikas** | *28 avril 2022* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The tool is really light weight, easy to use and inexpensive software which integrated and runs well in almost any type of servers. Operation and Controlling is really convenient for all IT employees and of course it makes our life easier. > > **Inconvénients**: I almost see no cons about Ansible but this software can be optimized more for always in the list of techies. > > Overall this tool is a must use for all the IT related stuffs. Anyone can easily operate, troubleshoot the issue and can modify the changes easily in Ansible Tower. The easy modification and deployment makes it best suited and enables Ansible to be the best among all the existing automation tools in the market. ----- ### "RedHat supported automation center tool" — 4.0/5 > **Marcin** | *14 février 2024* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use and great integration with the rest of RedHat stack upon which a lot of open source products and offerings are using. > > **Inconvénients**: Price of enterprise support for the features it offers over open-source AWX. > > For small projects or without a tight RedHat stack integration the free AWX might be better, but for bigger ones, with more complexity, when you are required to contractually guarantee support in all cases you want a tried and tested platform components with manufacturer support and that is where Tower comes in. A key tool to manage your nodes and their tool stack and deployments. ----- ### "Stable IaaS platform with a STEEP learning curve." — 3.0/5 > **María Laura** | *24 juillet 2018* | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It does not need client-side processes or configuration (just ssh access). Command line interface is fast and comprehensive. Support is fast and everywhere. > > **Inconvénients**: The learning curve is steep (I mean it). Reports are not as powerful or customizable as other tools in the market. SSH, while easy to use, lacks security. > > System configuration automation is now done in a jiff. ----- ### "Great for Automation, Configuration Management, and Auditing/Reporting" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *12 avril 2020* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Really like the Automation over other competing products like Puppet (you really need to know how to code in Ruby.) Love the concepts of Playbooks and Plays and the NetApp-specific (https://netapp.io) modules for ONTAP. Really simple to use\! The configuration management and Auditing/Reporting are also really good. > > **Inconvénients**: The ONTAP 9.5 to 9.6 has some REST API differences. Also you really need the Tower to do full audit configuration reporting and auditing. The free versions or non-Ansible versions don't have sufficient reporting functionality which is really important. Especially the configuration conformance reports. > > We are trying to manage our NetApp Storage cluster configurations for both automated provisioning and security audit configuration management. We're still POC'ing the software but so far it's simple and easy to setup. Once we do more complicated playbooks it'll be interesting to see how it turns out. ----- ### "Ansible - The configuration management tool with the large community." — 4.0/5 > **Gurleen** | *28 octobre 2018* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The Red hat Ansible Tower is a complete one stop tool that can manage your code. Best thing in it provide the large number of template to choice of Configuration management deployment. Scalability of hundreds nodes is also easy. It have master that run on the server. The secure ssh is used to remotely login to client systems. As clients machine does not need any specific setup on the system which make it easy and simple to manage. The uses push configuration technology in which we need can push the setting to the specific system on which we need that setting. For configuration script writing we can use yaml. As it’s easy to learn,setup \& manage so it’s every organisation first choice as configuration management tool,which help in devOps practice. > > **Inconvénients**: As the Ansible Tower is now Red Hat Ansible Tower. It’s growing fast and learning curves are more sharp with each updates, I always looking for the new fix and addition features added in updates as I have to check my compatibility of each time the company jumping to the new version. It's sure for Linux users but not very needy for windows users. > > It’s helping us in deploying the hundreds of server with no time and no human error as it make it fully automatic after the configuration. Best feature is surely it’s dashboard by which we get the notification once the things are not according to our plan. With the help of Red Hat Ansible Tower we are jumping to pure DevOps environment. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/149875/ansible-tower?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/149875/ansible-tower) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées