--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur BrowserStack, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plateforme de test multinavigateur conçue pour aider les développeurs à tester des applications mobiles et des sites web. > > Conclusion : 774 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise BrowserStack ? En bref : toute personne qui conçoit et/ou développe pour le web ouvert. Ces outils de test interactifs multinavigateurs ne requièrent aucune compétence en codage. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 774 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Ciblage du public - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Détection d'anomalies - Enquêtes et feedback - Enregistrement et transcription vidéo - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des audits - Gestion des documents - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des performances - Gestion des risques - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tests - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Identification des goulots d'étranglement - Indicateurs quantitatifs - Intégration continue - Mesure des performances - Monitoring - Monitoring réseau - Multiple Test Types - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Rapports et analyses - Scripts de test - Scénarios de test de charge - Suivi de la conformité - Suivi des activités - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des problèmes - Taçabilité - Test de charge - Test des performances - Test mobile - Test web - Visualisation de données - Vue hiérarchique - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Suivi des bugs](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Test de charge](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.lu/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.lu/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [kapptivate](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1069772/kapptivate) — 4.5/5 (6 reviews) 5. [Lightster](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1063000/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2 avril 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Inconvénients**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24 mars 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Inconvénients**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 avril 2026* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Inconvénients**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 avril 2026* | Produits chimiques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Inconvénients**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- ### "Great Free Version With a lot More Option When Using Full Version" — 5.0/5 > **LEONARDO** | *3 avril 2026* | Télécommunications | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Disclaimer: My team and I have only used the Test Management tool from Browserstack, so I am reviewing only this part. The thing I like the most is the limited free version of the software. Why? because it is really important to be able to check all the features the limited edition has to offer, so the team can evaluate the software and decide if this is the way to go or not. I really appreciate the functionalities that the limited version offers, as we (as a team) are slowly getting to a point where we would probably need more. And we can go to our management and sat "hey, look, we have used this, but now we would need more. We have 100 test scenarios, but the development could be much faster". > > **Inconvénients**: When we started using the free version of the tool, we quickly realized that this will probably not be enough. We really miss the AI integration, at least limited one, with the free version, because this would speed up our process tremendously. It is not a "deal breaker", but it would be nice to have. > > I would say that it was 9/10. I am deducting one point because of the lack of AI in the free version (at least a limited version). Otherwise the tool is absolutely super. user management is great, test case creation is nice, also the management of already created cases is easy. We are a team of 4 people and everybody got used to it immediately and now we are using it on a daily basis. And don't forget the integaration with other Browserstack solutions. I have only reviewed the Test Management part, as this is the only one that we are currently using. i have used the test recording fetaure and it was a blast, so it is only a matter of time when we will use more Browserstack's features. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées