--- description: reqSuite® rm : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur reqSuite® rm, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: reqSuite® rm - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des exigences](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [reqSuite® rm](/software/162954/reqsuite) # reqSuite® rm Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) > Un outil de gestion des relations de premier plan pour les entreprises de taille moyenne innovantes : facile à utiliser, puissant, 100 % personnalisable et rapidement déployable. > > Conclusion : 35 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise reqSuite® rm ? Des entreprises d'un large éventail de secteurs font confiance à ReqSuite® RM. Grâce à sa configurabilité simple et étendue, cette solution peut être rapidement et complètement adaptée à la situation de chaque client. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 35 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: OSSENO Software GmbH - **Pays**: Kaiserslautern, Allemagne - **Fondé**: 2014 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Windows (sur site) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, français - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Autriche, Belgique, Bulgarie, Canada, Danemark, Espagne, Estonie, Finlande, France, Irlande, Islande, Israël, Italie, Lettonie, Liechtenstein, Lituanie, Luxembourg, Norvège, Pays-Bas et 7 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Budgétisation et prévision - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Définition des priorités - Gestion de versions - Gestion des changements - Gestion des documents - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des tâches - Gestion du cycle de vie - Outils de collaboration - Suivi de la progression des tâches ## Intégrations (10 au total) - Azure DevOps Server - ClickUp - Enterprise Architect - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Redmine - TestRail ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Outils ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [PLM (product lifecycle management)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.lu/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.lu/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.lu/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) ## Avis ### "ReqSuite RM - Requirement Management software easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Ioana** | *22 mai 2024* | Appareils médicaux | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to use, intuitive, great support from Osseno. They are always quick to reply. Onboarding was done smoothly. The team could start using the tool right after the onboarding sessions, without the need to deep dive into documentation. Osseno learning platform is also easy to use. > > **Inconvénients**: I wished that the traceability matrix could be created using more than 2 parameters. Example: module requirement --\> component requirements --\> test cases. > > Great experience, if you start inserting the requirements of your system on the right hierarchical levels in ReqSuite RM (this depends on the project template you are using), so you can link to tasks in Jira. ----- ### "Easy, flexible Customer Support and good value for Requirements Engineering\!" — 5.0/5 > **Leon** | *10 novembre 2025* | Appareils médicaux | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Great Customer Support, we got a very good package from the start as an early stage company and was greatly supported by \[sensitive content hidden\] himself. Especially for lean teams the software is very good suited, we worked with very holistic PLM tools before which would be an overkill for our team size. Team Collaboration works very good as well. > > **Inconvénients**: The software could improve regarding usability and certain functionalities are not directly clear but apart from that we are happy with it. > > We are very happy to work with the ReqSuite team and their flexibility to react and find practical solutions. ----- ### "Easy to Use Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *20 février 2026* | Design | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Reqsuite is a great value with alot of capability for a very value oriented price. Some tools may have slightly more capabilities but have significantly more expense. The tool is quite intuitive to use overall and provides a great level of traceability. > > **Inconvénients**: The ability to order created items in a drag/drop order is limited and can only be done via folders. This is a new feature that has been requested but is the largest challenge. > > The overall experience has been great. The support and answering questions has been very supportive overall. The tool is quite intuitive and most users are able to navigate it effectively with a basic level of training. ----- ### "Poor user experience" — 1.0/5 > **Ilona** | *12 décembre 2024* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Methodology behind seems to be quite good, but the implementation is poor. Excel import/export is quite good as it allows me not to use ReqSuite. > > **Inconvénients**: Terrible user experience - opening tickets only in one window - time consuming to do anything, several seconds to open another/parent ticket, no sensible tracking of dependencies (only direct links, so the most important info like full decomposition of requirements to system function or cross-dependenciess are not available) - everything needs to opened one by one which again takes time. Discussion/comment section is so tiny... Navigation in ticket detail is confusing and very annoying - when I open the detail in 1-window system, the search list is no longer visible until closing/minimizing the detail. Strange behaviour when updating decomposed issues - when I update one, it freezes the whole structure and it is not possible to work with them until it it propagates everything (which can take anything from 10s - 3mins) > > In short - very bad user experience and very unefficient tool for managing requirement. One-window is very 1995-like feature. Requires to spend hours and hours to manage simple structure this way. Use JIRA or Confluence instead... ----- ### "Powerful tool, sometimes frusturating." — 4.0/5 > **Alondra** | *13 mars 2026* | Recherche | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The versatility in all the different item types and links which can be created. It makes it easy to build up the database you need for your project. > > **Inconvénients**: Slow and clumsy interface. For example, loading a given requirement takes several seconds. If items are sorted into sub folders, there's no easy way to see all the items within a parent folder. Importing items from other projects is not currently working. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées