--- description: R4J : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur R4J, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: R4J - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Gestion des exigences](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [R4J](/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j) # R4J Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j?page=2) > R4J - Requirements Management for Jira est une extension native de Jira, qui permet à toutes les parties prenantes de gérer les exigences directement dans Jira. > > Conclusion : 6 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise R4J ? R4J - Requirements Management for Jira permet aux ingénieurs des exigences, aux propriétaires de produits et à toutes les autres parties prenantes de collecter, gérer et maintenir les exigences de produits ou de services directement dans Jira. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 6 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 5.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 100% | (10/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: ease solutions - **Pays**: Oberhausen, Allemagne - **Fondé**: 2003 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 10,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Chromebook (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Autriche, Brésil, Canada, Chine, Colombie, Danemark, Espagne, Finlande, France, Inde, Italie, Japon, Malaisie, Mexique, Norvège, Pays-Bas, Portugal et 7 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Définition des priorités - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des changements - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des tâches - Outils de collaboration - Suivi de la progression des tâches ## Intégrations (3 au total) - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Gestion des exigences](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Outils ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 2. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.lu/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.lu/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 4. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.lu/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 5. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.lu/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) ## Avis ### "Simple Requirement Management for JIRA" — 5.0/5 > **Rahul** | *13 juillet 2022* | Automatisation industrielle | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The simplistic interface of R4J Add-In makes it very easy to manage and track requirements within the JIRA. Most software projects manage requirements using JIRA, but most struggle with managing requirements and organizing them, R4J excels in this aspect. > > **Inconvénients**: The provision to define multiple versions of requirements could be a good value add. As of now, we have to update the single requirement if the requirement updates. It makes it little difficult to track the old requirements. Yes, we can do that via the History tab but this would be a good option to add. > > It is a good add-in that mixes very well with your JIRA experience and is very consistent with JIRA in all the ways. I would recommend anyone looking to manage requirements well in JIRA to consider this add-in. ----- ### "R4J for more than requirements" — 4.0/5 > **Henrik** | *16 novembre 2020* | Automobile | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to keep everyone involved in the requirement management. Makes traceability easy and simple for everyone to understand. The issue tree view, easy to organize and get an overview. Helps all work in JIRA. Easy to create export templates, both word and excel. > > **Inconvénients**: Export template error messages could be improved. > > Helps throughout our ASPICE process development. Keeps traceability from customer requirements - test cases - test executions - documentation. ----- ### "Now we have our Jira data structured\!" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *27 octobre 2021* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: We were looking for a tool to organize our customer requirements and development tasks in a structured hierarchy. With R4J we found an easy and cost-efficient solution. The revision history and the baselining capability help us to keep track of our change history. The multi-level coverage provides us an overview of all depending elements. Quick way to share my views with my project team. > > **Inconvénients**: Minor small features missing, but this doesn´t matter. ----- ### "R4J for medical devices" — 4.0/5 > **Petra** | *5 novembre 2021* | Appareils médicaux | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I love the easy child access here, along with R4Js capability to handle any amount of parent-child hierarchies you might desire to trace (and document coverage of) your requirement. Take T4J in addition and this capability extends to verification specifications and even verification reports. 👍 I also appreciate the flexible export options to word documents with an extensible configuration language and word templates. > > **Inconvénients**: That R4J and T4J are not available as cloud products (yet?) > > CogniMed provides technical development services in regulated industries such as medical technology and aviation. We develop hardware, software and complete products for customers. Our focus is on perfectly documented development services for this demanding environment. We have been using R4J for many years and projects by now. It is is perfect for our needs. Our customers love it, too and some have acquired the tools themselves after learning how to work with it at our company.“ ----- ### "Using R4J for Jira Requirements Management" — 5.0/5 > **Joyce** | *23 août 2022* | Administration publique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Cost, setup, and ease of use. Traceability and Requirements reuse were a must for us. > > **Inconvénients**: Would like more granular permissions in folder view. > > This is an awesome app. We have successfully built a full Application Lifecycle Management tool within Jira. R4J offers requirement reuse, baselines, and complete traceability. This tool comes along with exceptional customer support as well. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/164178/requirements-management-for-jira-r4j) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## Données structurées