--- description: TestMu AI : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur TestMu AI, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestMu AI - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/170732/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest Page : 1/23\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) > La plateforme d'exécution de tests fiable de LambdaTest aide les utilisateurs à réduire leur temps de rétroaction des développeurs et à accélérer la mise sur le marché. > > Conclusion : 544 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise TestMu AI ? Les agences de marketing numérique, agences de web design et de développement web, entreprises de test de logiciels, intégrateurs système, PaaS, SaaS, entreprises en ligne, entreprises spécialisées dans l'e-learning et bien d'autres. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 544 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: LambdaTest - **Pays**: San Francisco, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2017 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 15,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Bahamas, Barbade, Belgique, Belize, Bermudes, Bulgarie, Canada, Chypre, Costa Rica, Cuba, Danemark, Dominique, Espagne et 43 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion de projets - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Visualisation de données - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (15 au total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Suivi des bugs](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Test des performances](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.lu/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (135 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 4. [Centercode](https://www.capterra.lu/software/187442/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) 5. [WebLOAD](https://www.capterra.lu/software/138288/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "A Reliable and Efficient Cross-Browser Testing Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Navneet** | *17 mars 2025* | Logistique et chaîne d'approvisionnement | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: LambdaTest's intuitive interface and extensive browser compatibility testing have significantly streamlined our testing processes. > > **Inconvénients**: To date, we have not encountered any issues while using LambdaTest. > > My overall experience with LambdaTest has been highly positive. The platform provides a comprehensive and user-friendly solution for cross-browser testing, making it incredibly easy to test websites and web applications across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices. The intuitive interface and seamless navigation allowed me to quickly set up and execute tests without any hassle. ----- ### "Excellant FeedBack working on Cloud devices from LambdaTest" — 5.0/5 > **KETAN** | *16 janvier 2026* | Banque | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: TestMU AI (prior LambdaTest) is an excellent cloud based testing platform which helped us testing out apps over multiple cloud devices. It provides many variations in which a user can select ranging from Android to iOS, with sim without sin devices. Excellant tool > > **Inconvénients**: Basically the sessions recordings were not great and few of the devices were responding slow subject to their data centres reach and availablity > > It has been a good experience working with the lambda test and it provides us a great support in terms of like app testing (UAT OR production apps), so it was a great platform in which we use to upload our apps through Google drive or manually and then it used to test across many cloud platform ranging from Android to iOS and there are good provisions in which you know you can add multiple devices ----- ### "Frustrating Support Experience" — 2.0/5 > **Rohan** | *6 mai 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 2.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The dashboard is pretty straightforward and onboarding new team members hasn't required much internal hand holding. Basic functionality and the UI is not giving us trouble. > > **Inconvénients**: Experience with support was terrible. They took multiple tries to even simply explain their Multi-Device offering to me, and I've had different agents give me different information. Everytime you ask a counter question, they want to get on a call. Why cant you just equip yourself better and resolve queries? I would schedule a call if I had the time, why would I reach out on chat? > > Basic functionality work fine, so getting by. But every interaction with support is a nightmare. They also recently removed their base tier Real Device Plan. We wanted to expand our parallels, but our hard luck. By the time we got to procuring, it had already disappeared and now the base price is higher ----- ### "This service is a life-saver" — 5.0/5 > **Jörn** | *27 février 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I especially like the ease of being able to test our sites in a multitude of different browsers and operating systems without having to have the actual systems around. > > **Inconvénients**: In the absolute beginning of our test journey we tried accessing one of our private sites that was not accessible on the open internet at that time and it took us a few minutes to download and enable the integrated tunnel - but that was entirely on us, the UI did not hide that feature at all. > > We are using this service for about a year now and only had to read through documentation once because the UI is so intuitive. Because of this we did not have to reach out to customer support once. ----- ### "Very Helpful for iOS and Flutter App Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Saumil** | *7 janvier 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I like most about LambdaTest is the easy access to real devices and different iOS versions in one platform. It helps me test iOS and Flutter apps without managing physical devices. The interface is simple and testing setup is quick. It saves a lot of time in daily development and release cycles. > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes there is a waiting time for popular real devices during peak hours. Also, a few devices can feel a bit slow when the network is not stable. However, overall performance and usability are still good for regular testing work. > > Overall, my experience with LambdaTest has been very good and smooth. It is reliable for testing iOS and Flutter apps on multiple devices and OS versions. The platform is easy to use and saves a lot of testing time. It helps in delivering better quality apps with fewer issues. ----- Page : 1/23\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées