--- description: Apache Subversion : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Apache Subversion, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Apache Subversion - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion du code source](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Apache Subversion](/software/177270/apache-subversion) # Apache Subversion Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion?page=2) > Système open source de contrôle des révisions qui fournit une résolution interactive des conflits, un suivi des fusions, un verrouillage des fichiers, etc. > > Conclusion : 49 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.1/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Apache Subversion ? Développeurs de logiciels. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.1/5** | 49 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 60% | (6/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Apache Software Foundation - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion de versions ## Ressources d'aide - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Git](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177211/git) — 4.8/5 (472 reviews) 2. [Nova](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1031874/nova) — 5.0/5 (1 reviews) 3. [FlexNet Code Aware](https://www.capterra.lu/software/208699/flexnet-code-aware) (0 reviews) 4. [abc](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1026917/abc) (0 reviews) ## Avis ### "Best software for versioning of files or documents" — 4.0/5 > **Jayesh** | *16 mai 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: easy to maintain the current and historical versions of files such as source code, web pages, and documentations. > > **Inconvénients**: according to my experience, there is no any features that i don't like about this software. > > Easy to use this software. I would like to highlight some of its features in short note as following. Create Repository, Checkout, Update, Perform Changes, Review Changes, Fix Mistakes, Resolve Conflicts,Commit Changes and many more. After all these about features i would like to say that there should be one feature in it and that is while we are working on any file and meanwhile if any other is trying to edit that file then it should alert that someone else is working in this file. It will be help the both person that who is working on this file so they can work in that way which will reduce the conflicts of files. ----- ### "Subversion: Code storage another way." — 5.0/5 > **Simon** | *31 octobre 2023* | Services d'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use and having the master (centralised) copy on site. Subversion maintains a master copy - the main source - and copies are made from that. Also having the ability to properly store binary, rather than textual files, is a bonus when wanting to version images or PDFs. Like GIT, but not Visual Source Safe (when we migrated), SVN gives the ability for many people to edit and change files and to merge the changes. > > **Inconvénients**: It is more difficult, if using an 'internal' server, to access remotely. You have to ensure that SSH tunnels etc are in place to grant remote access. > > Having come from Visual Source Safe in the early 2000s, Subversion was great in that it enabled more than one person to access and edit a file. Committing and merging those files is pretty straightforward and the flexibility it offers it good. In addition, if there are secure areas of a project that only a few should see, the granular access features enable that to happen. ----- ### "Subversion Exists" — 2.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *7 novembre 2022* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: When there is no other option, Subversion is there. We were stuck with Subversion due to company policy and it serviced the need well enough. It did what it set out to do, with no bells or whistles. > > **Inconvénients**: The toolset has a use case and if you venture to far away from what they envisioned, it is difficult to work with. We changed our process to match Subversion due to this which is never a good feeling when you are using a tool. > > Subversion works, it is just not a flashy tool or great experience. We never had a failure or issue with the tool not working, it was just not a flexible tool that grew with us. ----- ### "Version control" — 5.0/5 > **Bogdan** | *17 octobre 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Personally I consider SVN to be the perfect balance between functionality and control. When working in a mixed team environment repository security and locking are paramount and SVN makes everything simple. Post commit hooks are also very useful and easy to implement. > > **Inconvénients**: I like the git ability to perform local commits and I'd love to have it in SVN but it I find the benefits of a centralised repository much more important. > > I've been using SVN ever since I've migrated from Microsoft VSS and I still find it as powerful as ever and still relevant in 2022. We now use much better visual tools and online hosting services integrated with testing and CI/CD tools but the core SVN experience is still as good as it was ----- ### "Simple yet powerful source repository" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *28 avril 2021* | Automobile | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The main power of this tool is its simplicity. It does what it's supposed to do, and does not offer countless options that you need to learn before using it. When used in conjunction with tortoise, you get an easy integration with visual studio and MS file explorer. Unlike other products, committing and checkout code is just a matter of right click and choose commit or checkout... that's it, and that's how it's supposed to be. > > **Inconvénients**: Its simplicity can be a small nuisance here. The power you get to implement any branching strategy you like for instance, can turn out to be a little chaotic after a while if multiple teams use different strategies. There is no release management and automated build option and no option to add some kind of ticketing mechanism, you're going to need integration with other products for that. Again, simplicity is great, but you'll need other products in conjunction to subversion... > > Speed\! As developers we like to spend the least amount of time getting the latest code, creating tickets, and start working. Subversion never fails in getting you started within a few seconds. Its one of those products that you never even think about. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées