--- description: Apache Subversion : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Apache Subversion, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Apache Subversion - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion du code source](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Apache Subversion](/software/177270/apache-subversion) # Apache Subversion Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion?page=2) > Système open source de contrôle des révisions qui fournit une résolution interactive des conflits, un suivi des fusions, un verrouillage des fichiers, etc. > > Conclusion : 49 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.1/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Apache Subversion ? Développeurs de logiciels. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.1/5** | 49 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 60% | (6/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Apache Software Foundation - **Fondé**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne ## Fonctionnalités - Gestion de versions ## Ressources d'aide - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion du code source](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Git](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177211/git) — 4.8/5 (470 reviews) 2. [Nova](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1031874/nova) — 5.0/5 (1 reviews) 3. [abc](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1026917/abc) (0 reviews) 4. [FlexNet Code Aware](https://www.capterra.lu/software/208699/flexnet-code-aware) (0 reviews) ## Avis ### "Superbe logiciel de versionning" — 5.0/5 > **Loïc** | *7 mai 2024* | Marketing et publicité | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: - Versionning des fichiers - OpenSource - Idéal contre les fichiers corrompus. Les fichiers sont rappelés en une seconde - Facile à installer - Gestion des utilisateurs \& groupes assez complètes > > **Inconvénients**: Le produit est fortement concurrencé par Git/Gitlab par exemple qui offre des fonctionnalités en plus. ----- ### "Best software for versioning of files or documents" — 4.0/5 > **Jayesh** | *16 mai 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: easy to maintain the current and historical versions of files such as source code, web pages, and documentations. > > **Inconvénients**: according to my experience, there is no any features that i don't like about this software. > > Easy to use this software. I would like to highlight some of its features in short note as following. Create Repository, Checkout, Update, Perform Changes, Review Changes, Fix Mistakes, Resolve Conflicts,Commit Changes and many more. After all these about features i would like to say that there should be one feature in it and that is while we are working on any file and meanwhile if any other is trying to edit that file then it should alert that someone else is working in this file. It will be help the both person that who is working on this file so they can work in that way which will reduce the conflicts of files. ----- ### "Subversion: Code storage another way." — 5.0/5 > **Simon** | *31 octobre 2023* | Services d'information | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use and having the master (centralised) copy on site. Subversion maintains a master copy - the main source - and copies are made from that. Also having the ability to properly store binary, rather than textual files, is a bonus when wanting to version images or PDFs. Like GIT, but not Visual Source Safe (when we migrated), SVN gives the ability for many people to edit and change files and to merge the changes. > > **Inconvénients**: It is more difficult, if using an 'internal' server, to access remotely. You have to ensure that SSH tunnels etc are in place to grant remote access. > > Having come from Visual Source Safe in the early 2000s, Subversion was great in that it enabled more than one person to access and edit a file. Committing and merging those files is pretty straightforward and the flexibility it offers it good. In addition, if there are secure areas of a project that only a few should see, the granular access features enable that to happen. ----- ### "Managing Code Changes" — 3.0/5 > **Derrick** | *16 mai 2024* | Développement et commerce international | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: When I update a file, I just use "svn commit" to save the changes, and if needed, I can revert back easily with "svn revert". It's simple and keeps my workflow smooth. > > **Inconvénients**: Unlike Git, it doesn't handle distributed workflows as smoothly. Also, its branching and merging features are not as advanced, making it more challenging for complex projects. ----- ### "Version control" — 5.0/5 > **Bogdan** | *17 octobre 2022* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Personally I consider SVN to be the perfect balance between functionality and control. When working in a mixed team environment repository security and locking are paramount and SVN makes everything simple. Post commit hooks are also very useful and easy to implement. > > **Inconvénients**: I like the git ability to perform local commits and I'd love to have it in SVN but it I find the benefits of a centralised repository much more important. > > I've been using SVN ever since I've migrated from Microsoft VSS and I still find it as powerful as ever and still relevant in 2022. We now use much better visual tools and online hosting services integrated with testing and CI/CD tools but the core SVN experience is still as good as it was ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/177270/apache-subversion) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées