--- description: Endtest : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Endtest, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Endtest - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [Endtest](/software/180545/endtest) # Endtest Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/180545/endtest Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180545/endtest?page=2) > Tests automatisés sans code. Optimisé par le machine learning. > > Conclusion : 45 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.3/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Endtest ? Conçu pour les entreprises qui développent des applications web et mobiles. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.3/5** | 45 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Endtest - **Fondé**: 2016 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 178,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Vue hiérarchique - Vérification des scripts de test ## Ressources d'aide - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.lu/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (752 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [ACCELQ](https://www.capterra.lu/software/161589/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 4. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 5. [SoapUI](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170648/soapui) — 4.5/5 (168 reviews) ## Avis ### "Feature-packed - Easy to use and setup" — 4.0/5 > **Maarten** | *29 octobre 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It took less than half a day to get acquainted and up to speed with Endtest. We quickly had the first test cases set up. The ability to schedule test runs and invoke the tests through a URL are really helpful. > > **Inconvénients**: Endtest offers support for the most popular and recent browser versions. Would be great if older versions and less popular browsers can be tested in the same way. > > We ensure proper operation of new releases for our customers. Better quality, happier customers\! ----- ### "Excellent product" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *7 juillet 2020* | Hôpitaux et soins de santé | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: There are a lot of things. I can't just name a few > > **Inconvénients**: Codeless automated testing. It has never helped me automate any stuff. > > It was great experience. Maybe you guys can improve the mobile automation a little better. There are a lot errors there. I have already mentioned it to Matt, who is doing an excellent job. ----- ### "Decent Option for Cross-Browser/Device Testing" — 3.0/5 > **Glen** | *9 novembre 2018* | Hôtellerie | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Navigation is intuitive and the page loads quickly to ensure a good work pace. Broad support for different browsers and devices. If statement support and database connection/querying is also nice. > > **Inconvénients**: Lack of in-browser action recording features, no option to export/import to/from Selenium or other popular frameworks. No option for global or suite-level variables, and test-level variables are not displayed in an easy to view UI. > > One division of our company does use this for testing of our public-facing website. My team and I mostly work on internal tools for the company's finance team. I was unable to see a compelling reason to use this over GhostInspector or Mabl, both of which seem better suited for functional testing. The wide variety of device/browser compatibility is impressive, but not strictly necessary for our particular business needs. I think if EndTest had action recording, that would be a different story. ----- ### "A beginner testers view" — 5.0/5 > **Inguna** | *14 juillet 2020* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Video recordings of test execution were very helpful in determining if I need to tweak my test steps. Also, the gratifying moment when the test was run successfully. > > **Inconvénients**: Editing test steps could be easier, such as changing the sequence of steps without having to completely delete and write a new step. I would also have liked to reuse some parts of tests, sort of like a library of snippets that you can build. > > I did manual testing before trying Endtest. Even with my relatively limited technical knowledge, I was still able to learn how to set up tests properly. ----- ### "Automating work and tests with unparalleled ease" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *18 août 2021* | Bibliothèques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The ease of use of Endtest is great. I came from automating manually with Python, which was a lot slower. Now I can press record, do the test, and it's as good as done. Just add some logic with the easy-to-navigate Action menu to finish up. > > **Inconvénients**: One of the few things that I miss, compared with 'manual' programming, is being able to copy individual lines of code/actions. There is an option to copy/move an entire test case however. > > So far we have automated some easy jobs which were previously manually processed. We're also busy setting up scheduled regression tests. ----- Page : 1/3\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180545/endtest?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180545/endtest) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées