--- description: invideo : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur invideo, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: invideo - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Montage vidéo](/directory/20022/video-editing/software) > [invideo](/software/180680/invideo) # invideo Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/180680/invideo Page : 1/18\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180680/invideo?page=2) > InVideo vous aide à transformer vos contenus en de superbes vidéos. > > Conclusion : 413 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise invideo ? InVideo vous aide à transformer vos contenus en de superbes vidéos. L'éditeur offre ses services aux entreprises de médias, aux petites entreprises et aux marques pour stimuler l'implication du public par le biais de contenus vidéo pertinents. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 413 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: invideo - **Pays**: San Francisco, É.-U. ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 100,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Inde, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - AI Voices - Animations et transitions - Bibliothèque de contenu - Content Generation - Convertisseur de texte en vidéo - Création de vidéos - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de contenu - Gestion vidéo - Intelligence artificielle et machine learning - Logiciels d'animation - Modèles - Montage vidéo - Médiathèque - Outils de collaboration - Partage social - Personalization and Recommendation - Prise en charge de plusieurs langues - Prompt Engineering - Saisie vidéo - Stratégie de marque personnalisable - Superposition de texte - Superposition des marques - Traitement automatique du langage naturel - Téléchargement par lots - Video Templates - Voice Cloning ## Intégrations (1 au total) - Brightcove ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Montage vidéo](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/20022/video-editing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Montage vidéo](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/20022/video-editing/software) - [Gestion vidéo](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30754/video-management/software) - [Logiciels d'édition vidéo](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/31677/video-making/software) - [Logiciels de génération de vidéos avec IA](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/34376/ai-video-generator/software) - [Logiciels de synthèse vocale](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/33256/text-to-speech/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Synthesia](https://www.capterra.lu/software/198045/enact) — 4.6/5 (314 reviews) 2. [CreateStudio](https://www.capterra.lu/software/203897/create-studio) — 4.8/5 (578 reviews) 3. [Movavi Video Editor Plus](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1011548/movavi-video-editor-plus) — 4.8/5 (1135 reviews) 4. [Fliki](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1025058/fliki) — 4.7/5 (345 reviews) 5. [Pictory](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1012384/pictory) — 4.8/5 (163 reviews) ## Avis ### "All IN with InVideo" — 5.0/5 > **Wayne** | *10 août 2025* | Divertissement | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It makes producing YouTube content so easy. I generally drop in my pre-written script and storyboard and it creates the perfect results. > > **Inconvénients**: Be nice is I could start the creation process with an audio file. I create podcast for other platforms like Spotify and would then like to take that audio as the baseline and have the video generated from there. > > Very good. I started with very little knowedge - if any, and by using the edit function withint the InVideo platform I have come to understand the structure of video production which has also helped me with other platforms like Meld Studio and CapCut. ----- ### "InVideo Makes Video Creation So Easy" — 4.0/5 > **mike** | *25 mai 2026* | Internet | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: InVideo has become one of my favorite tools for creating quick, professional videos. The templates look great, the editor is simple to use, and the AI features save me a ton of time. Whether I’m making Reels, Shorts, or longer videos, it helps me get polished results fast. Highly recommend it for creators at any level. > > **Inconvénients**: The only real problem I have had with the editor is it did get buggy a couple times. I'm not sure if it was Invideo or my internet but something I will watch for. > > InVideo is an incredibly easy and efficient tool for creating professional‑looking videos in minutes. The interface is intuitive, the templates are high‑quality, and the AI features save a ton of time. Whether I’m making short‑form content or longer videos, the workflow is smooth and reliable. It’s become one of the most useful tools in my content‑creation stack. ----- ### "Disappointing Experience for Professional Content Creators" — 1.0/5 > **Vincenzo** | *17 juin 2026* | Services juridiques | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to get started. Fast generation of social media and promotional content. Responsive customer support. > > **Inconvénients**: Limited suitability for professional documentary production. Italian voice generation did not meet my expectations. Limited editorial control over the final output. Inconsistent results when accuracy and narrative coherence are important. Refund denied after same-day testing because credits had been consumed. > > I purchased the Max plan specifically to evaluate the platform for professional documentary and analytical content. After testing it, I concluded that it was not suitable for my intended use case. The platform may be useful for marketing videos and social media content, but it did not meet my expectations for more demanding editorial projects. ----- ### "Misleading Claims and Unusable Results Despite Additional Costs" — 1.0/5 > **Shawn** | *15 avril 2026* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The concept and marketing are very appealing. The idea of being able to quickly create videos from simple prompts using your own content is exactly what we were looking for as a small nonprofit > > **Inconvénients**: The platform did not function as advertised. It failed to reliably use uploaded assets, generated incorrect and mismatched visuals, and required significant editing despite claiming none would be needed. The credit system made it costly to even attempt basic functionality, as credits were consumed without producing usable results. Even after acknowledging these issues, support denied a same-day refund. > > We are a small nonprofit organization and purchased InVideo based on its advertised ability to “create videos without limit” and generate complete videos from simple prompts with “no editing needed.” Within the first couple of hours of using the platform—and during our very first video attempt—it became clear that the product does not deliver on these claims. The system did not reliably use our uploaded assets, did not follow the structure we provided, and generated visuals that were completely mismatched to the content. Scenes included incorrect imagery, blank or incorrect color screens, and unanimated elements where animation was expected. The result was not just slightly off—it was entirely unusable. The platform also claims that videos can be created “just like asking a human editor” and that “no editing is needed.” This was not our experience. The output was nowhere close to usable and would have required significant manual editing, defeating the purpose of the tool. Additionally, the “create videos without limit” claim is misleading. Video generation is heavily restricted by a credit system. While attempting to create a single video, we were prompted to purchase additional credits. We spent over $100 more in good faith, expecting this would resolve the issue. Instead, those credits were consumed without producing a usable result. At that point, the only option presented was to purchase even more credits to try again, despite the fact that the underlying issues were clearly not resolved. This creates a situation where users must continue paying simply to attempt basic functionality. InVideo also advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee. However, in practice, this guarantee is effectively unusable. In our case, simply attempting to generate a video—without downloading or exporting any usable content—consumed credits and made us ineligible for a refund. Since the platform did not produce a usable result, there was no meaningful way to evaluate the service without immediately forfeiting refund eligibility. Importantly, customer support acknowledged that the platform “didn’t perform as expected” and specifically referenced issues such as incorrect visuals, mismatched scenes, and difficulty using uploaded assets—all of which we experienced. Despite this acknowledgment, and despite requesting a refund the same day after only a few hours of use, our refund request was denied based solely on policy. This was not a case of extended use or dissatisfaction over time. It was immediately clear that the platform could not deliver what was advertised, yet no refund was offered or considered. In summary: The platform did not deliver on its core advertised functionality The “no limits” claim is constrained by a costly credit system Additional purchases did not resolve fundamental issues The generated output was not usable without extensive editing The 7-day guarantee is effectively voided by attempting to use the product The company acknowledged these issues but still denied a same-day refund We strongly encourage other organizations—especially nonprofits or small teams with limited budgets—to proceed with caution and fully understand the limitations and costs before committing. This was a costly and disappointing experience for our organization. ----- ### "Invideo is great for AI video" — 4.0/5 > **Jade** | *8 septembre 2025* | Marketing et publicité | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ai driven video creation, extensive template library, multilingual support. This is also user friendly and has an intuitive design. > > **Inconvénients**: There are limitations with editing features, the script to video editor can be a bit clunky and not as intuitive with social media integrations. > > Great for script to video faceless videos but lacks a lot of other features that would make this a really powerful app. ----- Page : 1/18\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180680/invideo?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/180680/invideo) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées