--- description: Antsle Private Cloud : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Antsle Private Cloud, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Antsle Private Cloud - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de gestion du cloud](/directory/30852/cloud-management/software) > [Antsle Private Cloud](/software/187769/antsle-private-cloud) # Antsle Private Cloud Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/187769/antsle-private-cloud Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/187769/antsle-private-cloud?page=2) > Une solution qui allie la simplicité et l'évolutivité du cloud public avec la sécurité et les économies de l'hébergement sur site. > > Conclusion : 17 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.5/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Antsle Private Cloud ? Toute équipe de technologie ou de développement recherchant un cloud simple et privé pouvant être hébergé sur site. Il s'agit d'une IaaS (infrastructure en tant que service) destinée à toute entreprise souhaitant développer ou héberger des logiciels avec un contrôle total. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.5/5** | 17 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Antsle - **Fondé**: 2017 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 349,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Essai gratuit) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Ressources d'aide - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de gestion du cloud](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30852/cloud-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Google Cloud](https://www.capterra.lu/software/170983/google-cloud-platform) — 4.7/5 (2262 reviews) 2. [DoiT](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1033442/doit) — 4.8/5 (56 reviews) 3. [AWS CloudFormation](https://www.capterra.lu/software/205397/cloudformation) — 4.5/5 (106 reviews) 4. [Zapier](https://www.capterra.lu/software/130182/zapier) — 4.7/5 (3043 reviews) 5. [Datadog](https://www.capterra.lu/software/135453/datadog-cloud-monitoring) — 4.6/5 (357 reviews) ## Avis ### "Great system for virtualization\!" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *10 juin 2019* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: antsle is extremely easy to setup and use. The templates that are already in place make deployment very easy and once you have customized them to you it is a breeze to duplicate them out for whatever you need. The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate around. The functions that you need are exposed for easy access and if you need to do something more advanced you can go to the shell. > > **Inconvénients**: The only thing that I had a little bit of a challenge with at first was the default passwords for each of the templates, but once I noted them and deployed a few machines + made my own templates, it became a breeze. Overall I haven't really found many things I don't like > > antsle has allowed me to virtualize the bulk of my servers and to only leave a few bare metal servers. I have been able to bring down my ESXi environment which saves me energy, heat and money. ----- ### "Saved from Production Disasters" — 5.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *14 juin 2019* | Médias de diffusion | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Price for what I can do. I can spin up as many servers as I need, to do whatever I want. It is easy to use and very intuitive. I can test just about everything before putting it into production. > > **Inconvénients**: Instructions are clear, but occasionally something is left out, like a reboot or restart of a service is needed. It makes you wonder if you broke something. > > I regularly advert potential production disasters with help from my Antsle. When there are no available servers in our datacenter to test on. I can install our special CentOS image on my Antsle in minutes, and clone it or create new Linux instances in seconds. I regularly make OS changes, test new software, and have fun trying new things that could and do sometimes corrupt the OS. The best part, there is 100% no risk to my production environment. I am able to perform all the necessary changes and test scenarios on my Antsle before applying them across my entire environment with no issues. ----- ### "Great idea but not worth the money" — 2.0/5 > **Robert** | *15 novembre 2019* | Télécommunications | Taux de recommandation : 1.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Ease of use, up and running in minutes and very easy to create and spin up new antlets > > **Inconvénients**: Lacks key features such as nested virtualization, oversubscription of resources, and the ability to free up resources by pausing an antlet (in VMWare, if you pause a VM you can use those resources to run another VM, and you can switch between the two by pausing). > > I need to run "Simulators" of an application that I support for multiple customers. There are about 10-15 flavors of the simulator, and ideally I would like to run as many at one time as possible. My Antsle allows me to run anywhere from 2-4 at one time and to easily shut down one and turn on another (depending on the version / flavor that I need). However due to the nature of my simulator, all config is lost upon power off, so if the antsle had the option to pause the antlet, free up the resources, and switch back and forth, it would provide much more value. ----- ### "Has only become more useful" — 5.0/5 > **Alistair** | *9 septembre 2019* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Very easy to use. I can spin up new servers or containers in seconds, and discard them just as easily when I'm finished, and integrating them into my overall network environment is smooth. And it scales beautifully from running heavyweight antlets (a Windows Server 2016 domain controller) to trivially tiny ones (a web proxy that handles maybe a dozen requests per day). > > **Inconvénients**: While the documentation is clear and easy to use, my requirements are occasionally off-the-wall enough that I wish it had more documentation on the overall architecture, and how all the pieces fit together. > > I originally got my Antsle as a test server for development, which it handled very easily and using only a fraction of its capacity; then, when another server failed, that part of the production network was moved to the Antsle, which handled it smoothly while still serving as a test server. Currently, it's hosting several production servers, part of a Docker swarm cluster, and assorted test antlets simultaneously, with no problems, and great performance. In a nutshell, I've got far more out of my investment in Antsle than I planned to, and I couldn't be more pleased about that. ----- ### "Satisfied Antsle user" — 5.0/5 > **Peter** | *5 septembre 2019* | Agriculture | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It was easy to set up. With the later releases of AntMan, the user interface gets better and better. Runs silently and does not contribute significantly to the heat of the machine room > > **Inconvénients**: 1. The cloud backups are a very good idea, but not well suited if you have a slow internet connection. Being a farm in the country we have terrible internet service (6Mbps download, 1.5Mbps upload) . I've never successfully backed up my windows 2016 server instance. The claim a local backup is on the horizon, but until that arrives if you have a slow internet connection the backup feature is useless. 2. It is unfortunate you cannot rename an antlet directly. You have to take a snapshot, then clone it to a new antlet. > > I run a windows 2016 server that manages all farm databases as well as an automated irrigation system. All these functions are on the local intranet side, so the slow WAN internet speed is not an issue. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/187769/antsle-private-cloud?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/187769/antsle-private-cloud) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées