--- description: HeavyBid : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur HeavyBid, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HeavyBid - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) > [HeavyBid](/software/34221/heavybid) # HeavyBid Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/34221/heavybid Page : 1/22\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/34221/heavybid?page=2) > Pour les sous-traitants en infrastructure qui soumissionnent pour des projets allant de 1 000 à plus d'un milliard de dollars. > > Conclusion : 506 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise HeavyBid ? Entreprises d'infrastructure dans les secteurs des transports, des services publics, du pétrole et du gaz, de l'électricité et des bâtiments industriels et commerciaux. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 506 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.8/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: HCSS - **Pays**: Sugar Land, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1986 ## Contexte commercial - **Public cible**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Canada, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Analyse hypothétique - Correcteur grammatical - Estimation des coûts - Gestion de projets - Gestion des offres - Gestion des ordres de changement - Gestion des sous-traitants - Modèles personnalisables - Outils de collaboration - Relevé des matériaux - Subcontractor Monitoring - Suivi des coûts - Suivi des projets ## Intégrations (3 au total) - Microsoft Excel - QuickBooks Online - Sage Accounting ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de devis pour le bâtiment](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30056/construction-estimating/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des offres pour la construction](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30960/construction-bid-management/software) - [Logiciels pour sous-traitance](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/32699/subcontractor/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [PlanHub](https://www.capterra.lu/software/179042/planhub) — 4.3/5 (457 reviews) 2. [Contractor Foreman](https://www.capterra.lu/software/166113/contractor-foreman) — 4.5/5 (823 reviews) 3. [STACK](https://www.capterra.lu/software/147181/stack-takeoff) — 4.5/5 (1395 reviews) 4. [RIB Candy](https://www.capterra.lu/software/126567/candy) — 4.5/5 (241 reviews) 5. [RSMeans Data Online](https://www.capterra.lu/software/151681/rsmeans) — 4.2/5 (304 reviews) ## Avis ### "Limited Fields are Biggest Negative" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *2 octobre 2018* | Logiciels de construction | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It offers lots of options for how to enter bid items. The modules talk to each other well so information does not have to be entered numerous times. > > **Inconvénients**: The character limit in the description field is the most aggravating quality. I enter descriptions that are sometimes three lines long and they don't fit. I have to make up absurd abbreviations because my estimators don't like the Alternate Description feature as they have to toggel between them. > > It's great for most estimating functions and it is super easy to copy files. However, the limited description is such a drawback it would probably preclude me from actully recommedning it to others in my field who would invariably run into the same issue. ----- ### "Moved to Estimating Link" — 4.0/5 > **Nick** | *25 octobre 2024* | Agriculture | Taux de recommandation : 5.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Able to copy over bids for similar projects > > **Inconvénients**: The service after HCSS was sold out went downhill. I had a lot of trouble using HCSS Dispatcher. > > Loved it for the first 20 years that I used it. Like I said, once they get large, the little guy doesn't matter anymore. ----- ### "Only Longtime Users Can Possibly Like HeavyBid" — 2.0/5 > **Jeremy** | *27 novembre 2020* | Logiciels de construction | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Customer support is good. It has to be because HeavyBid itself is archaic. > > **Inconvénients**: 1. Anything in bulk. Example: Cannot even “non-add” multiple activities. Rather, you must click on one at a time and then click the “non-additive” radio button on each and every activity. Such limitations are in all areas of the software. 2. Sorting and organizing is essentially non-existent. This aspect of HeavyBid is one of the most frustrating things I’ve ever encountered on any software of any kind. This is especially frustrating on bids with child and grandchild bid items requiring reorganization. In resource setup registers, there is no way to sort. Material lists can be quite large and HeavyBid offers no way to sort this data. Unbelievable that this is the case in 2020. API integrations are not even on the table because of the old architecture of HeavyBid. It seems that those giving HeavyBid good reviews have not been exposed to other platforms. HeavyBid is an outdated software that needs to be completed rewritten to stay relevant. I have been a user of the following estimating software platforms TPL, B2W, InEight Estimate, HeavyBid. > > HeavyBid is YEARS (perhaps decades) behind other platforms, especially InEight. HCSS needs to rewrite the entire platform in order to be relevant again. ----- ### "The Best Estimating Software in the World\!" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *17 juillet 2014* | Logiciels de construction | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Product: This is a very fast, user-friendly, automated estimating and bidding system that is particularly effective for Unit-Price contracts. It allows quick creation of accurate estimates, accommodates variations in quantities, allows risk evaluation on an item-by-item basis, and provides the means to price individual bid items so that they reflect the bidder's assessments of quantity, value, and risk for each item. Vendor: HCSS sets the standard for customer support. There is no software company anywhere, of any type, with whom I have had contact that comes even close to the responsiveness and excellence of HCSS' technical support. It is extremely rare that a call is not answered before the third ring by a human who understands the problem (no matter how arcane) and who has the right answer, without sending me to a second- or third-level technician. The professionalism and expertise of the Technical Support team are near-perfect. I tell people whom I am training that if they get stuck on a problem for more than three minutes, they should call Tech Support. The person who answers will have the problem solved, and the estimator will be back in production nearly instantaneously. > > **Inconvénients**: There is little to dislike in a system that works so well and with a technical support team that is so knowledgeable. HCSS takes suggestions from its users and implements them in new releases of the software so that the system is always cutting-edge and fulfills its users' expectations. The system seems expensive to purchase and maintain, at least to the non-using evaluator, but the confidence in the accuracy of the estimate, the outstanding technical support, and the continuous improvement of the software will provide confidence that offsets cost. One caught and corrected mistake that that would have gone unnoticed without HeavyBid's analysis tools, could pay for a dozen licenses for years. ----- ### "Have experience with other software estimating systems." — 5.0/5 > **Lou** | *8 août 2022* | Logiciels de construction | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Easy to incorporate to the type of work you do. It is only limited to your imagination. > > **Inconvénients**: I think the review can be updated to be easier to see what has been reviewed. I talked about it at our users meeting in Houston earlier this year. I was told it has been brought up and the software engineers are looking into it. That is a great thing with HCSS..... taking users comments and making the software better. > > I have had 15 plus years experience setting up Heavy bid with two different companies. I changed jobs to another company that had Sharpesoft. Support was awful. When ODOT and PENNDOT changed the electronic formatting a few years ago, it was very frustrating because Sharpesoft didn't keep up. It was a nightmare. I did change companies once again \& I am a very happy user of HCSS Heavy bid. ----- Page : 1/22\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/34221/heavybid?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/34221/heavybid) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées