--- description: NavRisk : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur NavRisk, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Luxembourg. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: NavRisk - Avis, notes, prix et abonnements - Capterra Luxembourg 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de traitement des réclamations](/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) > [NavRisk](/software/68177/navrisk) # NavRisk Canonical: https://www.capterra.lu/software/68177/navrisk Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/68177/navrisk?page=2) > DAVID Corporation est le développeur de NAVRISK VISION, la solution d'automatisation de la gestion la plus robuste du marché des risques. > > Conclusion : 14 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **3.2/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise NavRisk ? L'expertise de l'éditeur porte dans les solutions logicielles d'assurance et de gestion des risques pour les mutualisations de risques d'entités publiques, les administrateurs tiers (TPA) et les entreprises autoassurées. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **3.2/5** | 14 Avis | | Simplicité | 2.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 3.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 2.9/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 3.0/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 40% | (4/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: DAVID - **Pays**: Wakefield,, É.-U. - **Fondé**: 1984 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 40.000,00 $US - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Devis - Déclarations de sinistre électroniques - Facturation - Gestion de la conformité - Gestion de la souscription - Gestion des audits - Gestion des clients - Gestion des contrôles internes - Gestion des renouvellements - Suivi des réclamations - Émission de stratégie - Évaluation des risques ## Ressources d'aide - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de traitement des réclamations](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de traitement des réclamations](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30029/claims-processing/software) - [Logiciels pour assureurs](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/20036/insurance-policy/software) - [Gestion des risques](https://www.capterra.lu/directory/30665/risk-management/software) ## Logiciels similaires 1. [Pirani](https://www.capterra.lu/software/196959/pirani) — 4.5/5 (203 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.lu/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 3. [D\&B Finance Analytics](https://www.capterra.lu/software/202723/d-b-finance-analytics) — 4.5/5 (137 reviews) 4. [Scrut Automation](https://www.capterra.lu/software/1052809/scrut) — 4.9/5 (138 reviews) 5. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.lu/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) ## Avis ### "We were an early adopter of NavRisk and have been pleased since the roll out." — 5.0/5 > **Paul** | *29 novembre 2017* | Administration publique > > **Avantages**: Ease of accessibility even from the field. We can access it when we are at meetings with out laptops with no need for a special connection. I love that I can even access it from my iPhone. > > **Inconvénients**: The document generation via letters in the system. The old silver light version was not that great and the newer version it replaced is even worse. ----- ### "Has everything we need and great customer service" — 4.0/5 > **Cassandra** | *4 décembre 2017* | Logiciels de construction | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The value and the customer service, it has everything we need for claim's software. The company is very friendly as well. > > **Inconvénients**: Hard to use, can have some issues when inputting data. Not user-friendly. I have to write down a lot of the step by step directions. ----- ### "Disappointing. Web based program not as functional as we had hoped. Renaissance was better." — 3.0/5 > **Pattijo** | *8 décembre 2017* | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Having web-based software is ideal for traveling. The EDI reporting works efficiently most of the time which is critical since electronic reporting is required of insurers in MT. The response time is consistently good. This was a concern when we began looking at webbased software. Creating trouble tickets is easy. We periodically get emails requesting our opinion and we're asked if we have any concerns. If we had more time we would take more advantage of support when its offered. The annual contract service fee is reasonable. > > **Inconvénients**: SAP Reporting has been the biggest problem. Running reports is slow. The formatting /shading of the reports uses too much paper and ink. The drop-downs default to oldest dates. This is particularly a problem in medical review. The MT fee schedule is updated annually. When we enter CPT code, system defaults to the oldest fee schedule. We have to scroll down to select the newest fee schedule amounts. Unecessarily time consuming. Default needs to be changed to grab the newest date. It's baffling to us that this hasn't been fixed. It doesn't seem we are the only insurer that this affects. > > Web based software allows us to work claims when we're traveling. ----- ### "I process changes to the policies and issue certificates of insurance" — 4.0/5 > **Denise** | *5 décembre 2017* | Assurance | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the overall layout of the screens-easy to read and quick to look up items such as particular vehicles and properties by typing a few letters. > > **Inconvénients**: too many tabs to go through for looking at a particular item and more steps in processing work and the process to do certificates is not user friendly as I am unable to revise a certificate holder name (I have to add a new item to the list of certificate holders). > > Better layout of information and user friendly in some items (looking up particular vehicles, properties, finding a member). ----- ### "My experience with NavRisk Vision has been extremely disappointing." — 2.0/5 > **Michael** | *4 décembre 2017* | Assurance | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Inconvénients**: No commas for amounts in many places, e.g. claims summary and detail tabs. This makes it very difficult to tell the amount of large numbers (we have claims that are over $1.0 million). NavRisk Vision report cannot be scheduled to run automatically. This is a feature that has been part of the David Corp claims software since 1988. When exporting files out of NavRisk Vision the default file type is for Chrystal Reports rather than the pdf format. Bulk payments - claim number has to be reentered for each payment, reverts to first claim in the bulk payments. Certain check printing features that were in prior systems are no longer available. Problems with 1099 reporting. ----- Page : 1/2\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://www.capterra.lu/software/68177/navrisk?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://www.capterra.lu/software/68177/navrisk) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Données structurées